Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1929–1996 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Francis v. Franklingreen2 sentences1994Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307, 314 , 85 L. 1994Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307, 314 , 85 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Holdengreen2 sentences1994See State v. Holden, 280 N.C. 426 , 185 S.E.2d 889 (1972); State v. Woolard, 227 N.C. 645 , 44 S.E.2d 29 (1947). 1994See State v. Holden, 280 N.C. 426 , 185 S.E.2d 889 (1972); State v. Woolard, 227 N.C. 645 , 44 S.E.2d 29 (1947). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Tucker
green
2 sentences1996State v. Tucker, 317 N.C. 532 , 346 S.E.2d 417 (1986). 1996State v. Tucker, 317 N.C. 532 , 346 S.E.2d 417 (1986). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
South Carolina v. Gathers
red
2 sentences1994The defendant requested that the court charge the jury that aggravating circumstances are circumstances "that tend to make a specific Defendant particularly appropriate for the most serious and final punishment prescribed by law." The court refused this request and charged the jury that "[a]n aggravating circumstance is a fact or group of facts which tend to make a specific murder particularly deserving of the maximum punishment prescribed by law." The court also charged that "[a] mitigating circumstance or factor is a fact or group of facts, which ... may be considered as extenuating or reduc 1994The defendant requested that the court charge the jury that aggravating circumstances are circumstances "that tend to make a specific Defendant particularly appropriate for the most serious and final punishment prescribed by law." The court refused this request and charged the jury that "[a]n aggravating circumstance is a fact or group of facts which tend to make a specific murder particularly deserving of the maximum punishment prescribed by law." The court also charged that "[a] mitigating circumstance or factor is a fact or group of facts, which ... may be considered as extenuating or reduc | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Price
green
2 sentences1994This charge as to aggravating and mitigating circumstances was approved in State v. Price, 326 N.C. 56 , 388 S.E.2d 84 and State v. *571 Hutchins, 303 N.C. 321 , 279 S.E.2d 788 (1981). 1994This charge as to aggravating and mitigating circumstances was approved in State v. Price, 326 N.C. 56 , 388 S.E.2d 84 and State v. *571 Hutchins, 303 N.C. 321 , 279 S.E.2d 788 (1981). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Hutchins
green
2 sentences1994This charge as to aggravating and mitigating circumstances was approved in State v. Price, 326 N.C. 56 , 388 S.E.2d 84 and State v. *571 Hutchins, 303 N.C. 321 , 279 S.E.2d 788 (1981). 1994This charge as to aggravating and mitigating circumstances was approved in State v. Price, 326 N.C. 56 , 388 S.E.2d 84 and State v. *571 Hutchins, 303 N.C. 321 , 279 S.E.2d 788 (1981). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. . Woolard
neutral
2 sentences1994See State v. Holden, 280 N.C. 426 , 185 S.E.2d 889 (1972); State v. Woolard, 227 N.C. 645 , 44 S.E.2d 29 (1947). 1994See State v. Holden, 280 N.C. 426 , 185 S.E.2d 889 (1972); State v. Woolard, 227 N.C. 645 , 44 S.E.2d 29 (1947). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Mize
green
2 sentences1993The defendant says that the rule as formulated in recent cases such as State v. McAvoy, 331 N.C. 583 , 417 S.E.2d 489 (1992) and State v. Mize, 316 N.C. 48 , 340 S.E.2d 439 (1986), is inconsistent with Robinson . 1993The defendant says that the rule as formulated in recent cases such as State v. McAvoy, 331 N.C. 583 , 417 S.E.2d 489 (1992) and State v. Mize, 316 N.C. 48 , 340 S.E.2d 439 (1986), is inconsistent with Robinson . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. McAvoy
green
2 sentences1993The defendant says that the rule as formulated in recent cases such as State v. McAvoy, 331 N.C. 583 , 417 S.E.2d 489 (1992) and State v. Mize, 316 N.C. 48 , 340 S.E.2d 439 (1986), is inconsistent with Robinson . 1993The defendant says that the rule as formulated in recent cases such as State v. McAvoy, 331 N.C. 583 , 417 S.E.2d 489 (1992) and State v. Mize, 316 N.C. 48 , 340 S.E.2d 439 (1986), is inconsistent with Robinson . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Williams
green
2 sentences1991In State v. Williams, 279 N.C. 663 , 185 S.E.2d 174 (1971), we held it was error for the court to allow a question on cross-examination as to whether the witness had been charged with a crime. 1991In State v. Williams, 279 N.C. 663 , 185 S.E.2d 174 (1971), we held it was error for the court to allow a question on cross-examination as to whether the witness had been charged with a crime. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Swift Co. v. . Aydlett
green
2 sentences1929This aspect of the case is governed by the principle declared in Swift v. Aydlett, 192 N. C., 330 , 135 S. E., 141 . 1929This aspect of the case is governed by the principle declared in Swift v. Aydlett, 192 N. C., 330 , 135 S. E., 141 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.