Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Campbellgreen2 sentences2009State v. Campbell, 359 N.C. 644, 691 , 617 S.E.2d 1, 30 (2005), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1073 , 164 L. 2009State v. Campbell, 359 N.C. 644, 691 , 617 S.E.2d 1, 30 (2005), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1073 , 164 L. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Duncangreen2 sentences2009See State v. Duncan, 188 N.C.App. 508 , 656 S.E.2d 597 (Hunter, J., dissenting) ("[i]f an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is prematurely brought, this Court may dismiss the claim without prejudice, allowing the defendant to reassert the claim during a subsequent motion for appropriate relief proceeding."), rev'd per curiam for reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, 362 N.C. 665 , 669 S.E.2d 738 (2008). 2009See State v. Duncan, 188 N.C.App. 508 , 656 S.E.2d 597 (Hunter, J., dissenting) ("[i]f an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is prematurely brought, this Court may dismiss the claim without prejudice, allowing the defendant to reassert the claim during a subsequent motion for appropriate relief proceeding."), rev'd per curiam for reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, 362 N.C. 665 , 669 S.E.2d 738 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Duncangreen2 sentences2009See State v. Duncan, 188 N.C.App. 508 , 656 S.E.2d 597 (Hunter, J., dissenting) ("[i]f an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is prematurely brought, this Court may dismiss the claim without prejudice, allowing the defendant to reassert the claim during a subsequent motion for appropriate relief proceeding."), rev'd per curiam for reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, 362 N.C. 665 , 669 S.E.2d 738 (2008). 2009See State v. Duncan, 188 N.C.App. 508 , 656 S.E.2d 597 (Hunter, J., dissenting) ("[i]f an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is prematurely brought, this Court may dismiss the claim without prejudice, allowing the defendant to reassert the claim during a subsequent motion for appropriate relief proceeding."), rev'd per curiam for reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, 362 N.C. 665 , 669 S.E.2d 738 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pulley
green
2 sentences2009State v. Pulley, 180 N.C.App. 54 , 69, 636 S.E.2d 231 , 242 (2006) (citations omitted), disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 574 , 651 S.E.2d 375 (2007). 2009State v. Pulley, 180 N.C. | 3 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Nelson
neutral
1 sentence2009State v. Pulley, 180 N.C.App. 54 , 69, 636 S.E.2d 231 , 242 (2006) (citations omitted), disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 574 , 651 S.E.2d 375 (2007). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Potts
neutral
1 sentence2009State v. Pulley, 180 N.C.App. 54 , 69, 636 S.E.2d 231 , 242 (2006) (citations omitted), disc. review denied, 361 N.C. 574 , 651 S.E.2d 375 (2007). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Fair
green
2 sentences2008However, “[i]f an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is prematurely brought, this Court may dismiss the claim without prejudice, allowing the defendant to reassert the claim during a subsequent motion for appropriate relief proceeding.” Id. 2008However, "[]if an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is prematurely brought, this Court may dismiss the claim without prejudice, allowing the defendant to reassert the claim during a subsequent motion for appropriate relief proceeding." Id. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.