Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Barlowe
green
2 sentences2020Because “the error amounts to a violation of defendant’s constitutional rights, it is prejudicial unless the State shows the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.” Barlowe, 157 N.C. 2020Because “the error amounts to a violation of defendant’s constitutional rights, it is prejudicial unless the State shows the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.” Barlowe, 157 N.C. | 6 | 2007–2020 |
State v. Barlowe
green
2 sentences2015"If the error amounts to a violation of defendant's constitutional rights, it is prejudicial unless the State shows the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt." State v. Barlowe, 157 N.C.App. 249 , 253, 578 S.E.2d 660 , 662-63, writ denied, review denied, 357 N.C. 462 , 586 S.E.2d 100 (2003). 2007"If the error amounts to a violation of defendant's constitutional rights, it is prejudicial unless the State shows the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt." State v. Barlowe, 157 N.C.App. 249, 253 , 578 S.E.2d 660, 662-63 , disc. rev. denied, 357 N.C. 462 , 586 S.E.2d 100 (2003). | 2 | 2007–2015 |
State v. Graham
green
1 sentence2018"The standard of review for alleged violations of constitutional rights is de novo ." State v. Graham , 200 N.C. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.