7 North Carolina opinions name it 3 courts 1993–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bluebird Corp. v. Aubingreen1 sentence2026Defendants seek dismissal of Plaintiff’s fourth claim, contending that Plaintiff’s tort claim is barred by the applicable three-year statute of limitations governing contracts and the economic loss doctrine. 60 Plaintiff premises his constructive fraud claim on the same conduct as the fiduciary duty claim, so where appropriate, the Court will consider these claims together. 59 Regarding choice of law, “[t]he internal affairs doctrine is a conflict of laws principle which recognizes that only one State should have the authority to regulate a corporation’s internal affairs . . . because otherwis | 1 | 1 |
Dallaire v. Bank of America, N.A.green1 sentence2026“Ordinary borrower-lender transactions . . . are considered arm’s length and do not typically give rise to fiduciary duties.” Dallaire v. Bank of Am., N.A., 367 N.C. 363, 368 (2014). | 1 | 1 |
Heath v. Craighill, Rendleman, Ingle & Blythe, P.A.green1 sentence2018Heath v. Craighill, Rendleman, Ingle & Blythe, P.A., 97 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Blow v. Shaughnessygreen1 sentence2011See Blow, 88 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sharp v. Teague
green
1 sentence2012“Fraud by an attorney . . . is not within the scope of ‘professional services’ . . . [and] cannot be ‘malpractice’ within the meaning of [G.S. § 1-15(c)].” Sharp v. Teague, 113 N.C. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Brazen v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
green
1 sentence2001Corp., 695 A.2d 43 (Del. 1997), in which the Delaware Supreme Court chose to rely on a liquidated damages analysis rather than use the fiduciary duty analysis applied by the Chancery Court. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Midamerica Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.
green
2 sentences1993Id. 1993Id. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.