fiduciary duty claim (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

fiduciary duty claim in Colorado

6 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Cooper v. Parskygreen
ca2 · 1998 · cited in 3 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016See Cooper v. Parsky , 140 F.3d 433, 439 (2d Cir. 1998) (trial court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss on the plaintiff’s breach of fiduciary duty claim because the plaintiff "may not sue upon a duty which was expressly excluded from the Agreement"); Bank of Am., N.A. v. GREC Homes IX, LLC , No. 13-21718-CIV, 2014 WL 351962 , at *12 (S.D.

2016See Cooper v. Parsky, 140 F.3d 433 , 439 (2d Cir.1998) (trial court properly granted the defendant's motion to dismiss on the plaintiff's breach of fiduciary duty claim because the plaintiff "may not sue upon a duty which was expressly excluded from the Agreement"); Bank of Am., N.A. v. GREC Homes IX, LLC, No. 13-21718-CIV, 2014 WL 351962 , at *12 (S.D.Fla.

33
Robinson v. Colorado State Lottery Divisiongreen
colo · 2008 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012Robinson v. Colo. State Lottery Div., 179 P.3d 998, 1004 (Colo.2008).

11
Miller v. Byrnegreen
coloctapp · 1995 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
1 sentence

2005For example, unless a breach of a fiduciary duty claim is admitted by the defendant, the plaintiff alleging a breach of fiduciary duty arising from the attorney-client relationship must establish by means of expert testimony the applicable standard of care and the de fendant’s failure to adhere to that standard of care.” (citation omitted)); see also Miller v. Byrne, supra, 916 P.2d at 580 (“Some breach of fiduciary duty claims, such as those here, ‘are basically negligence claims ... often requiring the plaintiff to establish identical elements that must be established by a plaintiff in negli

11
Martinez v. Badisgreen
colo · 1992 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
2 sentences

2005For example, unless a breach of a fiduciary duty claim is admitted by the defendant, the plaintiff alleging a breach of fiduciary duty arising from the attorney-client relationship must establish by means of expert testimony the applicable standard of care and the de fendant’s failure to adhere to that standard of care.” (citation omitted)); see also Miller v. Byrne, supra, 916 P.2d at 580 (“Some breach of fiduciary duty claims, such as those here, ‘are basically negligence claims ... often requiring the plaintiff to establish identical elements that must be established by a plaintiff in negli

2005For example, unless a breach of a fiduciary duty claim is admitted by the defendant, the plaintiff alleging a breach of fiduciary duty arising from the attorney-client relationship must establish by means of expert testimony the applicable standard of care and the de fendant’s failure to adhere to that standard of care.” (citation omitted)); see also Miller v. Byrne, supra, 916 P.2d at 580 (“Some breach of fiduciary duty claims, such as those here, ‘are basically negligence claims ... often requiring the plaintiff to establish identical elements that must be established by a plaintiff in negli

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
ABC Trans National Transport, Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc. green
illappct · 1980
2 sentences

1992Davis v. Margolis, 215 Conn. 408 , 576 A.2d 489 (1990); Barth v. Reagan, 139 Ill.2d 399 , 151 Ill.Dec. 534 , 564 N.E.2d 1196 (1990); Goebel v. Lauderdale, 214 Cal.App.3d 1502 , 263 Cal.Rptr. 275 (1989); ABC Trans Nat'l Transp., Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc., 90 Ill.

1992Davis v. Margolis, 215 Conn. 408 , 576 A.2d 489 (1990); Barth v. Reagan, 139 Ill.2d 399 , 151 Ill.Dec. 534 , 564 N.E.2d 1196 (1990); Goebel v. Lauderdale, 214 Cal.App.3d 1502 , 263 Cal.Rptr. 275 (1989); ABC Trans Nat’l Transp., Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc., 90 Ill.

11992–1992
Davis v. Margolis green
conn · 1990
2 sentences

1992Davis v. Margolis, 215 Conn. 408 , 576 A.2d 489 (1990); Barth v. Reagan, 139 Ill.2d 399 , 151 Ill.Dec. 534 , 564 N.E.2d 1196 (1990); Goebel v. Lauderdale, 214 Cal.App.3d 1502 , 263 Cal.Rptr. 275 (1989); ABC Trans Nat'l Transp., Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc., 90 Ill.

1992Davis v. Margolis, 215 Conn. 408 , 576 A.2d 489 (1990); Barth v. Reagan, 139 Ill.2d 399 , 151 Ill.Dec. 534 , 564 N.E.2d 1196 (1990); Goebel v. Lauderdale, 214 Cal.App.3d 1502 , 263 Cal.Rptr. 275 (1989); ABC Trans Nat'l Transp., Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc., 90 Ill.

11992–1992
Goebel v. Lauderdale green
calctapp · 1989
2 sentences

1992Davis v. Margolis, 215 Conn. 408 , 576 A.2d 489 (1990); Barth v. Reagan, 139 Ill.2d 399 , 151 Ill.Dec. 534 , 564 N.E.2d 1196 (1990); Goebel v. Lauderdale, 214 Cal.App.3d 1502 , 263 Cal.Rptr. 275 (1989); ABC Trans Nat'l Transp., Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc., 90 Ill.

1992Davis v. Margolis, 215 Conn. 408 , 576 A.2d 489 (1990); Barth v. Reagan, 139 Ill.2d 399 , 151 Ill.Dec. 534 , 564 N.E.2d 1196 (1990); Goebel v. Lauderdale, 214 Cal.App.3d 1502 , 263 Cal.Rptr. 275 (1989); ABC Trans Nat'l Transp., Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc., 90 Ill.

11992–1992
Barth v. Reagan green
ill · 1990
2 sentences

1992Davis v. Margolis, 215 Conn. 408 , 576 A.2d 489 (1990); Barth v. Reagan, 139 Ill.2d 399 , 151 Ill.Dec. 534 , 564 N.E.2d 1196 (1990); Goebel v. Lauderdale, 214 Cal.App.3d 1502 , 263 Cal.Rptr. 275 (1989); ABC Trans Nat'l Transp., Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc., 90 Ill.

1992Davis v. Margolis, 215 Conn. 408 , 576 A.2d 489 (1990); Barth v. Reagan, 139 Ill.2d 399 , 151 Ill.Dec. 534 , 564 N.E.2d 1196 (1990); Goebel v. Lauderdale, 214 Cal.App.3d 1502 , 263 Cal.Rptr. 275 (1989); ABC Trans Nat'l Transp., Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc., 90 Ill.

11992–1992

Where else courts name it

DE 49 (1977–2026) NY 27 (2006–2023) TX 22 (2003–2024) IL 19 (1998–2021) CA 16 (1992–2026) MA 11 (2006–2026) OH 8 (2004–2025) AZ 7 (1963–2025) NC 7 (1993–2026) CO 6 (1992–2016) CT 6 (1999–2025) GA 6 (2013–2024) MI 4 (2020–2026) UT 4 (2018–2025) LA 3 (1997–2003) WA 3 (1990–2018) IN 3 (2000–2019) NV 2 (2019–2024) FL 2 (2008–2026) RI 2 (2004–2011) TN 2 (2004–2021) MD 2 (1964–1991)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check