7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carmelo Claudio Enrique Maymi v. Robert Snyder, Warden, Delaware Correctional Center M. Jane Brady, Attorney General of the State of Delawaregreen1 sentence2024See Claudio v. Snyder, 68 F.3d 1573 , 1575–76 (3d Cir. 1995) (collecting cases). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Vinsongreen2 sentences2001Thus, defendant sought to ask the juror's answer to a legal question before the juror had been properly instructed by the trial court as to the law. "[S]uch questions are confusing to the average juror who at that stage of the trial has heard no evidence and has not been instructed on the applicable law.... [S]uch questions tend to `stake out' the juror and cause him to pledge himself to a future course of action." State v. Vinson, 287 N.C. 326, 336 , 215 S.E.2d 60, 68 (1975), death sentence vacated, 428 U.S. 902 , 96 S.Ct. 3204 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1206 (1976). 2001Thus, defendant sought to ask the juror's answer to a legal question before the juror had been properly instructed by the trial court as to the law. "[S]uch questions are confusing to the average juror who at that stage of the trial has heard no evidence and has not been instructed on the applicable law.... [S]uch questions tend to `stake out' the juror and cause him to pledge himself to a future course of action." State v. Vinson, 287 N.C. 326, 336 , 215 S.E.2d 60, 68 (1975), death sentence vacated, 428 U.S. 902 , 96 S.Ct. 3204 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1206 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wilson
green
2 sentences2015The defendant argued that this procedure violated his right under the Constitution of North Carolina to a unanimous verdict. *118 We agreed and held that “where the trial court instructed a single juror in violation of defendant’s right to a unanimous jury verdict under Article I, Section 24, the error is deemed preserved for appeal notwithstanding defendant’s failure to object.” Id. at 486 , 681 S.E.2d at 331 . 2015The defendant argued that this procedure violated his right under the Constitution of North Carolina to a unanimous verdict. *118 We agreed and held that “where the trial court instructed a single juror in violation of defendant’s right to a unanimous jury verdict under Article I, Section 24, the error is deemed preserved for appeal notwithstanding defendant’s failure to object.” Id. at 486 , 681 S.E.2d at 331 . | 2 | 2013–2015 |
State v. McLaughlin
green
2 sentences2018The facts of the instant case are, however, more closely analogous to those presented in State v. McLaughlin , 320 N.C. 564 , 359 S.E.2d 768 (1987). 2018The facts of the instant case are, however, more closely analogous to those presented in State v. McLaughlin , 320 N.C. 564 , 359 S.E.2d 768 (1987). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Vinson v. North Carolina
green
1 sentence2001Thus, defendant sought to ask the juror's answer to a legal question before the juror had been properly instructed by the trial court as to the law. "[S]uch questions are confusing to the average juror who at that stage of the trial has heard no evidence and has not been instructed on the applicable law.... [S]uch questions tend to `stake out' the juror and cause him to pledge himself to a future course of action." State v. Vinson, 287 N.C. 326, 336 , 215 S.E.2d 60, 68 (1975), death sentence vacated, 428 U.S. 902 , 96 S.Ct. 3204 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1206 (1976). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Henderson v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences2001Thus, defendant sought to ask the juror’s answer to a legal question before the juror had been properly instructed by the trial court as to the law. “[S]uch questions are confusing to the average juror who at that stage of the trial has heard no evidence and has not been instructed on the applicable law. . . . [S]uch questions tend to ‘stake out’ the juror and cause him to pledge himself to a future course of action.” State v. Vinson, 287 N.C. 326, 336 , 215 S.E.2d 60, 68 (1975), death sentence vacated, 428 U.S. 902 , 49 L. 2001Thus, defendant sought to ask the juror's answer to a legal question before the juror had been properly instructed by the trial court as to the law. "[S]uch questions are confusing to the average juror who at that stage of the trial has heard no evidence and has not been instructed on the applicable law.... [S]uch questions tend to `stake out' the juror and cause him to pledge himself to a future course of action." State v. Vinson, 287 N.C. 326, 336 , 215 S.E.2d 60, 68 (1975), death sentence vacated, 428 U.S. 902 , 96 S.Ct. 3204 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1206 (1976). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Dillard v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences2001Thus, defendant sought to ask the juror’s answer to a legal question before the juror had been properly instructed by the trial court as to the law. “[S]uch questions are confusing to the average juror who at that stage of the trial has heard no evidence and has not been instructed on the applicable law. . . . [S]uch questions tend to ‘stake out’ the juror and cause him to pledge himself to a future course of action.” State v. Vinson, 287 N.C. 326, 336 , 215 S.E.2d 60, 68 (1975), death sentence vacated, 428 U.S. 902 , 49 L. 2001Thus, defendant sought to ask the juror's answer to a legal question before the juror had been properly instructed by the trial court as to the law. "[S]uch questions are confusing to the average juror who at that stage of the trial has heard no evidence and has not been instructed on the applicable law.... [S]uch questions tend to `stake out' the juror and cause him to pledge himself to a future course of action." State v. Vinson, 287 N.C. 326, 336 , 215 S.E.2d 60, 68 (1975), death sentence vacated, 428 U.S. 902 , 96 S.Ct. 3204 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1206 (1976). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Wainwright v. Witt
green
2 sentences1994Moreover, a trial judge’s decision to excuse a juror under this standard is entitled to deference because “there will be situations where the trial judge is left with the definite impression that a prospective juror would be unable to faithfully and impartially apply the law.” Id. at 425-26 , 83 L. 1994Moreover, a trial judge’s decision to excuse a juror under this standard is entitled to deference because “there will be situations where the trial judge is left with the definite impression that a prospective juror would be unable to faithfully and impartially apply the law.” Id. at 425-26 , 83 L. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Witherspoon v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1993Even so, because the improper excusal of a juror in violation of the principles of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , 20 L. 1993Even so, because the improper excusal of a juror in violation of the principles of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 , 20 L. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Fermin v. United States
green
1 sentence1993Ed. 2d 776 , reh’g denied, 393 U.S. 898 , 21 L. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.