Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Housegreen2 sentences2025As in State v. House, we “will not presume from a silent record that defense counsel argued defendant’s guilt without defendant’s consent.” 340 N.C. at 196 , 456 S.E.2d at 297 . 2025As in State v. House, we “will not presume from a silent record that defense counsel argued defendant’s guilt without defendant’s consent.” 340 N.C. at 196 , 456 S.E.2d at 297 . | 4 | 6 |
State v. Boydgreen2 sentences2020Moreover, we have made clear that the absence of any indication in the record of defendant’s consent to his counsel’s admissions will not—by itself—lead us to “presume defendant’s lack of consent.” State v. Boyd, 343 N.C. 699, 722 , 473 S.E.2d 327, 339 (1996); see State v. House, 340 N.C. 187, 196 , 456 S.E.2d 292, 297 (1995) (“This Court will not presume from a silent record that defense counsel argued defendant’s guilt without defendant’s consent.”). 2020Moreover, we have made clear that the absence of any indication in the record of defendant’s consent to his counsel’s admissions will not—by itself—lead us to “presume defendant’s lack of consent.” State v. Boyd, 343 N.C. 699, 722 , 473 S.E.2d 327, 339 (1996); see State v. House, 340 N.C. 187, 196 , 456 S.E.2d 292, 297 (1995) (“This Court will not presume from a silent record that defense counsel argued defendant’s guilt without defendant’s consent.”). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Adamsgreen2 sentences1995See State v. Adams, 335 N.C. 401, 410 , 439 S.E.2d 760, 764 (1994) (holding that incompleteness in a record precludes a defendant-appellant from showing that an error occurred). 1995See State v. Adams, 335 N.C. 401, 410 , 439 S.E.2d 760, 764 (1994) (holding that incompleteness in a record precludes a defendant-appellant from showing that an error occurred). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.