Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1962–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nowell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Companygreen2 sentences1998See Duke University v. Stainback, 320 N.C. 337, 341 , 357 S.E.2d 690, 692 (1987) (“Equitable estoppel may be invoked, in a proper case, to bar a defendant from relying upon the statute of limitations.”); Nowell v. Tea Co., 250 N.C. 575, 579 , 108 S.E.2d 889, 891 (1959) (“The lapse of time, when properly pleaded, is a technical legal defense. 1998See Duke University v. Stainback, 320 N.C. 337, 341 , 357 S.E.2d 690, 692 (1987) (“Equitable estoppel may be invoked, in a proper case, to bar a defendant from relying upon the statute of limitations.”); Nowell v. Tea Co., 250 N.C. 575, 579 , 108 S.E.2d 889, 891 (1959) (“The lapse of time, when properly pleaded, is a technical legal defense. | 2 | 5 |
Duke University v. Stainbackgreen2 sentences1998See Duke University v. Stainback, 320 N.C. 337, 341 , 357 S.E.2d 690, 692 (1987) (“Equitable estoppel may be invoked, in a proper case, to bar a defendant from relying upon the statute of limitations.”); Nowell v. Tea Co., 250 N.C. 575, 579 , 108 S.E.2d 889, 891 (1959) (“The lapse of time, when properly pleaded, is a technical legal defense. 1998See Duke University v. Stainback, 320 N.C. 337, 341 , 357 S.E.2d 690, 692 (1987) (“Equitable estoppel may be invoked, in a proper case, to bar a defendant from relying upon the statute of limitations.”); Nowell v. Tea Co., 250 N.C. 575, 579 , 108 S.E.2d 889, 891 (1959) (“The lapse of time, when properly pleaded, is a technical legal defense. | 1 | 1 |
Hayes v. Town of Fairmontgreen1 sentence1998Nevertheless, equity will deny the right to assert that defense when delay has been induced by acts, representations, or conduct, the repudiation of which would amount to a breach of good faith.”); Hayes v. Town of Fairmont, 130 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
HAND BY HAND v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.green1 sentence1992See Hand v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc., 85 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Willis v. J. M. Davis Industries, Inc.green2 sentences1981See also Willis v. Davis Industries, 280 N.C. 709 , 186 S.E. 2d 913 (1972). 1981See also Willis v. Davis Industries, 280 N.C. 709 , 186 S.E. 2d 913 (1972). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.