Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 2021–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
County of Lancaster v. County of Custergreen2 sentences2024See County of Lancaster v. County of Custer, 313 Neb. 622 , 985 N.W.2d 612 (2023). - 193 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 33 Nebraska Appellate Reports QUILES V. 2023COUNTY OF CUSTER Cite as 313 Neb. 622 pertaining to the assignments of error.” The rule specifies that “[e]ach assignment of error shall be separately numbered and paragraphed.” 14 The rule cautions that “[c]onsideration of the case will be limited to errors assigned and discussed in the brief,” but that “[t]he court may, at its option, notice a plain error not assigned.” 15 [1,2] Parties who wish to secure appellate review of their claims must abide by the rules of the Nebraska Supreme Court. 16 Any party who fails to properly identify and present its claim does so at its own peril. 17 Depend | 1 | 3 |
Vokal v. NEBRASKA ACCOUNTABILITY AND DISCLOSURE COMM.green2 sentences2021See, also, e.g., Vokal v. Nebraska Acct. & Disclosure Comm., 276 Neb. 988 , 759 N.W.2d 75 (2009); In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Larson, 270 Neb. 837 , 708 N.W.2d 262 (2006); In re Interest of Natasha H. & Sierra H., 258 Neb. 131 , 602 N.W.2d 439 (1999). 6 See In re Interest of Steven S. et al., 27 Neb. 2021See, also, e.g., Vokal v. Nebraska Acct. & Disclosure Comm., 276 Neb. 988 , 759 N.W.2d 75 (2009); In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Larson, 270 Neb. 837 , 708 N.W.2d 262 (2006); In re Interest of Natasha H. & Sierra H., 258 Neb. 131 , 602 N.W.2d 439 (1999). 6 See In re Interest of Steven S. et al., 27 Neb. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Buol
green
2 sentences2024State v. Buol, 314 Neb. 976 , 994 N.W.2d 98 (2023). 2023BUOL Cite as 314 Neb. 976 We have previously analogized the filing of a statement of errors with separately stated assignments of error. 12 Under that rule, any party who fails to properly identify and present its claim does so at its own peril. 13 Depending on the par- ticulars of each case, failure to comply with the mandates of § 2-109(D) may result in an appellate court waiving the error, proceeding on a plain error review only, or declining to con- duct any review at all. 14 In reviewing a judgment of a county court, a district court has similar discretion. [5] The general rule is that wh | 2 | 2023–2024 |
Quiles v. Collazo
green
1 sentence2026Quiles v. Collazo, 33 Neb. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
In Re Guardianship of Larson
green
2 sentences2021See, also, e.g., Vokal v. Nebraska Acct. & Disclosure Comm., 276 Neb. 988 , 759 N.W.2d 75 (2009); In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Larson, 270 Neb. 837 , 708 N.W.2d 262 (2006); In re Interest of Natasha H. & Sierra H., 258 Neb. 131 , 602 N.W.2d 439 (1999). 6 See In re Interest of Steven S. et al., 27 Neb. 2021See, also, e.g., Vokal v. Nebraska Acct. & Disclosure Comm., 276 Neb. 988 , 759 N.W.2d 75 (2009); In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Larson, 270 Neb. 837 , 708 N.W.2d 262 (2006); In re Interest of Natasha H. & Sierra H., 258 Neb. 131 , 602 N.W.2d 439 (1999). 6 See In re Interest of Steven S. et al., 27 Neb. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
In Re Interest of Natasha H.
green
2 sentences2021See, also, e.g., Vokal v. Nebraska Acct. & Disclosure Comm., 276 Neb. 988 , 759 N.W.2d 75 (2009); In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Larson, 270 Neb. 837 , 708 N.W.2d 262 (2006); In re Interest of Natasha H. & Sierra H., 258 Neb. 131 , 602 N.W.2d 439 (1999). 6 See In re Interest of Steven S. et al., 27 Neb. 2021See, also, e.g., Vokal v. Nebraska Acct. & Disclosure Comm., 276 Neb. 988 , 759 N.W.2d 75 (2009); In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Larson, 270 Neb. 837 , 708 N.W.2d 262 (2006); In re Interest of Natasha H. & Sierra H., 258 Neb. 131 , 602 N.W.2d 439 (1999). 6 See In re Interest of Steven S. et al., 27 Neb. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Steffy v. Steffy
green
1 sentence2021The court may, at its option, notice a plain error not assigned. [2,3] Parties who wish to secure appellate review of their claims must abide by the rules of the Nebraska Supreme Court. 4 Any party who fails to properly identify and present its claim does so at its own peril. 5 Depending on the particulars of each case, failure to comply with the mandates of § 2-109(D) may result in an appellate court waiving the error, proceed- ing on a plain error review only, or declining to conduct any review at all. 6 4 Steffy v. Steffy, 287 Neb. 529 , 843 N.W.2d 655 (2014). 5 Id. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
In re Interest of Steven S.
green
1 sentence2021See, also, e.g., Vokal v. Nebraska Acct. & Disclosure Comm., 276 Neb. 988 , 759 N.W.2d 75 (2009); In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Larson, 270 Neb. 837 , 708 N.W.2d 262 (2006); In re Interest of Natasha H. & Sierra H., 258 Neb. 131 , 602 N.W.2d 439 (1999). 6 See In re Interest of Steven S. et al., 27 Neb. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.