Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Elygreen2 sentences2021“In construing an individual jury instruction, the instruction should not be judged in artificial isolation but must be viewed in the context of the overall charge to the jury considered as a whole.” State v. Ely, 295 Neb. 607, 622 , 889 N.W.2d 377, 392 (2017). 2021“In construing an individual jury instruction, the instruction should not be judged in artificial isolation but must be viewed in the context of the overall charge to the jury considered as a whole.” State v. Ely, 295 Neb. 607, 622 , 889 N.W.2d 377, 392 (2017). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Devers
green
2 sentences2026State v. Devers, 306 Neb. 429 , 945 N.W.2d 470 (2020). 2020Although the court’s initial limiting instruction, given contemporaneously with Hanson’s testimony, referred only to evidence of “marijuana,” the court’s final jury instructions broadly encompassed the “evidence of seized controlled substances located at [Devers’ home].” In construing an individual jury instruction, the instruction should not be judged in artificial isolation but must be viewed 24 See State v. Freemont, 284 Neb. 179 , 817 N.W.2d 277 (2012). 25 Id. 26 State v. Thomas, supra note 15 . - 449 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports STATE v. DEVERS Cite as 306 | 2 | 2020–2026 |
State v. Putz
green
2 sentences2015State v. Putz, 266 Neb. 37 , 662 N.W.2d 606 (2003). 2015State v. Putz, 266 Neb. 37 , 662 N.W.2d 606 (2003). | 2 | 2006–2015 |
State v. Sellers
green
2 sentences2017These criteria included, among others: “Their interest in the result of the suit, if any”; “[t]he extent to which they are corroborated, if at all, by circumstances or the testi- mony of credible witnesses”; and “[a]ll other evidence, facts, and circumstances proved tending to corroborate or contradict such witnesses.” In reviewing the jury instructions as a whole, it is clear that the instructions correctly stated the law, were not misleading, and addressed the same issues in Ely’s proposed 20 State v. Sellers, 279 Neb. 220 , 777 N.W.2d 779 (2010). 21 State v. Iromuanya, supra note 17. - 623 2017These criteria included, among others: “Their interest in the result of the suit, if any”; “[t]he extent to which they are corroborated, if at all, by circumstances or the testi- mony of credible witnesses”; and “[a]ll other evidence, facts, and circumstances proved tending to corroborate or contradict such witnesses.” In reviewing the jury instructions as a whole, it is clear that the instructions correctly stated the law, were not misleading, and addressed the same issues in Ely’s proposed 20 State v. Sellers, 279 Neb. 220 , 777 N.W.2d 779 (2010). 21 State v. Iromuanya, supra note 17. - 623 | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Cupp v. Naughten
green
2 sentences2003See, e.g., Victor, supra; Cage, supra; Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141 , 94 S. Ct. 396 , 38 L. 2003See, e.g., Victor, supra; Cage, supra; Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141 , 94 S. Ct. 396 , 38 L. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.