Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Baker v. Carrgreen2 sentences2023“Deciding whether a matter has in any measure been committed by the Constitution to another branch of government is itself a delicate exercise in constitutional interpretation, and is a responsibility of this Court as ultimate interpreter of the State Constitution.” Id. (quotations and brackets omitted); see Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 211 (1962). 2020“The justiciability doctrine prevents judicial violation of the separation of powers by limiting judicial review of certain matters that lie within the province of the other two branches of government.” Hughes, 152 N.H. at 283 (quotation omitted). “‘Deciding whether a matter has in any measure been committed by the Constitution to another branch of government is itself a delicate exercise in constitutional interpretation, and is a responsibility of this Court as ultimate interpreter of the [State] Constitution.’” Id. (quoting Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 211 (1962)) (ellipsis omitted). | 3 | 3 |
In re the Judicial Conduct Committeegreen2 sentences2005Petition of Judicial Conduct Comm., 151 N.H. at 128 . 2005The justiciability doctrine prevents judicial violation of the separation of powers by limiting judicial review of certain matters that lie within the province of the other two branches of government.” Petition of Judicial Conduct Comm., 151 N.H. 123, 128 (2004) (quotation and citation omitted). | 1 | 2 |
Hughes v. Speaker of New Hampshire House of Representativesgreen2 sentences2020“The justiciability doctrine prevents judicial violation of the separation of powers by limiting judicial review of certain matters that lie within the province of the other two branches of government.” Hughes, 152 N.H. at 283 (quotation omitted). “‘Deciding whether a matter has in any measure been committed by the Constitution to another branch of government is itself a delicate exercise in constitutional interpretation, and is a responsibility of this Court as ultimate interpreter of the [State] Constitution.’” Id. (quoting Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 211 (1962)) (ellipsis omitted). 2020“The justiciability doctrine prevents judicial violation of the separation of powers by limiting judicial review of certain matters that lie within the province of the other two branches of government.” Hughes, 152 N.H. at 283 (quotation omitted). “‘Deciding whether a matter has in any measure been committed by the Constitution to another branch of government is itself a delicate exercise in constitutional interpretation, and is a responsibility of this Court as ultimate interpreter of the [State] Constitution.’” Id. (quoting Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 211 (1962)) (ellipsis omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Baines v. New Hampshire Senate President
green
1 sentence2006Id. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Horton v. McLaughlin
green
2 sentences2004The justiciability doctrine “prevents judicial violation of the separation of powers by limiting judicial review of certain matters that lie within the province of the other two branches of government.” Horton, 149 N.H. at 143 . 2004A case presents a nonjusticiable political question “where there is a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department.” Id. (quotation omitted). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.