Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 2018–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Vallejogreen2 sentences2025An effective curative instruction needs to be "firm, clear, and accomplished without delay." State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 134-35 (2009). 2025An effective curative instruction needs to be "firm, clear, and accomplished without delay." State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 134-35 (2009). | 4 | 5 |
State v. Allahgreen2 sentences2021State v. Allah, 170 N.J. 269, 281 (2002) (a mistrial is not appropriate if there is "an appropriate alternative course of action"). 2019State v. Allah, 170 N.J. 269, 281 (2002) (a mistrial is not appropriate if there is "an appropriate alternative course of action"). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Jimenezgreen2 sentences2018An effective curative instruction needs to be “firm, clear, and accomplished without delay.” State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 134 , 965 A.2d 1181 (2009); see also State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 452 , 921 A.2d 954 (2007) (noting trial court issued “immediate curative instruction” to deal with issues raised by State’s comments “promptly and effectively”); State v. Papasavvas, 163 N.J. 565, 614 , 751 A.2d 40 (2000) (explaining that State expert’s testimony regarding defendant’s guilt was improper but that “trial court’s curative instructions given immediately after [the] statements ... were suf 2018An effective curative instruction needs to be “firm, clear, and accomplished without delay.” State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 134 , 965 A.2d 1181 (2009); see also State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 452 , 921 A.2d 954 (2007) (noting trial court issued “immediate curative instruction” to deal with issues raised by State’s comments “promptly and effectively”); State v. Papasavvas, 163 N.J. 565, 614 , 751 A.2d 40 (2000) (explaining that State expert’s testimony regarding defendant’s guilt was improper but that “trial court’s curative instructions given immediately after [the] statements ... were suf | 2 | 2 |
State v. Prallgreen1 sentence2025"An effective curative instruction needs to be 'firm, clear, and accomplished without delay.'" State v. Prall, 231 N.J. 567, 586 (2018) (quoting State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 134 (2009)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. La Portegreen2 sentences2018An effective curative instruction needs to be “firm, clear, and accomplished without delay.” State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 134 , 965 A.2d 1181 (2009); see also State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 452 , 921 A.2d 954 (2007) (noting trial court issued “immediate curative instruction” to deal with issues raised by State’s comments “promptly and effectively”); State v. Papasavvas, 163 N.J. 565, 614 , 751 A.2d 40 (2000) (explaining that State expert’s testimony regarding defendant’s guilt was improper but that “trial court’s curative instructions given immediately after [the] statements ... were suf 2018An effective curative instruction needs to be “firm, clear, and accomplished without delay.” State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 134 , 965 A.2d 1181 (2009); see also State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 452 , 921 A.2d 954 (2007) (noting trial court issued “immediate curative instruction” to deal with issues raised by State’s comments “promptly and effectively”); State v. Papasavvas, 163 N.J. 565, 614 , 751 A.2d 40 (2000) (explaining that State expert’s testimony regarding defendant’s guilt was improper but that “trial court’s curative instructions given immediately after [the] statements ... were suf | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Winter
green
2 sentences2020"An effective curative instruction needs to be 'firm, clear, and accomplished without delay.'" Ibid. (quoting State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 134 (2009)). 2018An effective curative instruction needs to be “firm, clear, and accomplished without delay.” State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 134 , 965 A.2d 1181 (2009); see also State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 452 , 921 A.2d 954 (2007) (noting trial court issued “immediate curative instruction” to deal with issues raised by State’s comments “promptly and effectively”); State v. Papasavvas, 163 N.J. 565, 614 , 751 A.2d 40 (2000) (explaining that State expert’s testimony regarding defendant’s guilt was improper but that “trial court’s curative instructions given immediately after [the] statements ... were suf | 2 | 2018–2020 |
State v. Harvey
green
2 sentences2018An effective curative instruction needs to be “firm, clear, and accomplished without delay.” State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 134 , 965 A.2d 1181 (2009); see also State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 452 , 921 A.2d 954 (2007) (noting trial court issued “immediate curative instruction” to deal with issues raised by State’s comments “promptly and effectively”); State v. Papasavvas, 163 N.J. 565, 614 , 751 A.2d 40 (2000) (explaining that State expert’s testimony regarding defendant’s guilt was improper but that “trial court’s curative instructions given immediately after [the] statements ... were suf 2018An effective curative instruction needs to be “firm, clear, and accomplished without delay.” State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 134 , 965 A.2d 1181 (2009); see also State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 452 , 921 A.2d 954 (2007) (noting trial court issued “immediate curative instruction” to deal with issues raised by State’s comments “promptly and effectively”); State v. Papasavvas, 163 N.J. 565, 614 , 751 A.2d 40 (2000) (explaining that State expert’s testimony regarding defendant’s guilt was improper but that “trial court’s curative instructions given immediately after [the] statements ... were suf | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Papasavvas
green
2 sentences2018An effective curative instruction needs to be “firm, clear, and accomplished without delay.” State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 134 , 965 A.2d 1181 (2009); see also State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 452 , 921 A.2d 954 (2007) (noting trial court issued “immediate curative instruction” to deal with issues raised by State’s comments “promptly and effectively”); State v. Papasavvas, 163 N.J. 565, 614 , 751 A.2d 40 (2000) (explaining that State expert’s testimony regarding defendant’s guilt was improper but that “trial court’s curative instructions given immediately after [the] statements ... were suf 2018An effective curative instruction needs to be “firm, clear, and accomplished without delay.” State v. Vallejo, 198 N.J. 122, 134 , 965 A.2d 1181 (2009); see also State v. Wakefield, 190 N.J. 397, 452 , 921 A.2d 954 (2007) (noting trial court issued “immediate curative instruction” to deal with issues raised by State’s comments “promptly and effectively”); State v. Papasavvas, 163 N.J. 565, 614 , 751 A.2d 40 (2000) (explaining that State expert’s testimony regarding defendant’s guilt was improper but that “trial court’s curative instructions given immediately after [the] statements ... were suf | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.