Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Badonigreen2 sentences2013Compare State v. Badoni, 2003-NMCA-009, ¶ 7 , 133 N.M. 257 , 62 P.3d 348 (holding that a defendant had failed to preserve an argument that a jury instruction should have been given where the defendant “neither. tendered a written instruction nor orally dictated one” and the record did not show, that the defendant “informed the trial judge of the specific language he wanted in a modified instruction”). {48} On the merits, the denial of a jury instruction presents a mixed question of law and fact, which we review de novo. 2013Compare State v. Badoni, 2003-NMCA-009, ¶ 7 , 133 N.M. 257 , 62 P.3d 348 (holding that a defendant had failed to preserve an argument that a jury instruction should have been given where the defendant “neither. tendered a written instruction nor orally dictated one” and the record did not show, that the defendant “informed the trial judge of the specific language he wanted in a modified instruction”). {48} On the merits, the denial of a jury instruction presents a mixed question of law and fact, which we review de novo. | 3 | 3 |
State v. Rowellgreen2 sentences2006State v. Marshall, 2004-NMCA-104 , 136 N.M. 240, ¶ 6 , 96 P.3d 801 ; see State v. Rowell 121 N.M. 111, 114 , 908 P.2d 1379, 1382 (1995) (stating that “interpretation of a statute is an issue of law” subject to de novo review). 2006State v. Marshall, 2004-NMCA-104 , 136 N.M. 240, ¶ 6 , 96 P.3d 801 ; see State v. Rowell 121 N.M. 111, 114 , 908 P.2d 1379, 1382 (1995) (stating that “interpretation of a statute is an issue of law” subject to de novo review). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gaitan
green
2 sentences2013State v. Gaitan, 2002-NMSC-007, ¶ 10 , 131 N.M. 758 , 42 P.3d 1207 . 2013State v. Gaitan, 2002-NMSC-007, ¶ 10 , 131 N.M. 758 , 42 P.3d 1207 . | 3 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Swick
green
2 sentences2023State v. Swick, 2012-NMSC-018, ¶ 60 , 279 P.3d 747 . 2016State v. Swick, 2012-NMSC-018, ¶ 60 , 279 P.3d 747 . | 2 | 2016–2023 |
State v. Marshall
green
2 sentences2006State v. Marshall, 2004-NMCA-104 , 136 N.M. 240, ¶ 6 , 96 P.3d 801 ; see State v. Rowell 121 N.M. 111, 114 , 908 P.2d 1379, 1382 (1995) (stating that “interpretation of a statute is an issue of law” subject to de novo review). 2006State v. Marshall, 2004-NMCA-104 , 136 N.M. 240, ¶ 6 , 96 P.3d 801 ; see State v. Rowell 121 N.M. 111, 114 , 908 P.2d 1379, 1382 (1995) (stating that “interpretation of a statute is an issue of law” subject to de novo review). | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.