53 California opinions name it 2 courts 1923–2026 20 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co.green2 sentences1995(Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 554, 561, fn. 7 [ 194 Cal.Rptr. 773 , 669 P.2d 9 ].) *1699 Thus, a party seeking dismissal for lack of prosecution “shall serve and file a notice of motion at least 45 days before the date set for hearing . . . .” (Rule 373(a), italics added.) If “the court intends to dismiss an action on its own motion [for delay in prosecution], the clerk shall set a hearing on the dismissal and mail notice to all parties at least 20 days before the hearing date.” (Rule 372(a), italics added.) Here, the grant of dismissal in response to defense counsel’s 1995(Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 554, 561, fn. 7 [ 194 Cal.Rptr. 773 , 669 P.2d 9 ].) *1699 Thus, a party seeking dismissal for lack of prosecution “shall serve and file a notice of motion at least 45 days before the date set for hearing . . . .” (Rule 373(a), italics added.) If “the court intends to dismiss an action on its own motion [for delay in prosecution], the clerk shall set a hearing on the dismissal and mail notice to all parties at least 20 days before the hearing date.” (Rule 372(a), italics added.) Here, the grant of dismissal in response to defense counsel’s | 3 | 3 |
In Re Elijahgreen2 sentences2022Subdivision (a)(3) of section 352 provides: “In order to obtain a motion for a continuance of the hearing, written notice shall be filed at least two court days prior to the date set for hearing, together with affidavits or declarations detailing specific facts showing that a continuance is necessary, unless the court for good cause entertains an oral motion for continuance.” (§ 352, subd. (a)(3); see also, Cal.Rules of Ct., rule 5.550(a)(4).) The juvenile court may continue a dependency hearing at a parent’s request for good cause shown. (§ 352, subd. (a).) “Courts have interpreted this polic 2021An ICWA-020 form as to David, signed by David and filed on October 12, 2017, is part of the record. 14 provide children with stable environments, and the damage to a minor of prolonged temporary placements.’” (In re Abbigail A. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 83, 95 ; see § 352, subd. (a)(2) [“[c]ontinuances shall be granted only upon a showing of good cause and only for that period of time shown to be necessary by the evidence presented at the hearing on the motion for the continuance”]; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.550(a)(4) [“[i]n order to obtain a continuance, written notice with supporting documents must | 2 | 3 |
Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.green2 sentences2022Because we decide Quaid has forfeited its appellate challenges to two other dispositive issues, it is unnecessary for us to consider whether it also forfeited its challenge to this defense. 11 “A petition under this title shall be heard in a summary way in the manner and upon the notice provided by law for the making and hearing of motions, except that not less than 10 days’ notice of the date set for the hearing on the petition shall be given.” (§ 1290.2.) 17 (1997) 15 Cal.4th 951, 972 (Engalla).) The petitioning party must also prove a prior demand and refusal to arbitrate under the agreemen 2008Code of Civil Procedure section 1290.2 provides: “A petition under this title shall be heard in a summary way in the manner and upon the notice provided by law for the making and hearing of motions, except that not less than 10 days’ notice of the date set for the hearing on the petition shall be given.” In summary proceedings under Code of Civil Procedure sections 1281.2 and 1290.2, “the trial court sits as a trier of fact, weighing all the affidavits, declarations, and other documentary evidence, as well as oral testimony received at the court’s discretion, to reach a final determination. [C | 2 | 2 |
People v. Roermangreen2 sentences1988Section 170.6, subdivision (2), provides in part that when the parties know the identity of the judge or commissioner "assigned to or who is scheduled to" hear a matter at least 10 days before the date set for hearing, a challenge is untimely unless made at least 5 days before the hearing. [2] When a party files a motion and calendars it for hearing in a specified department of the superior court, is the judge's identity "known" for purposes of that provision? *93 In striking the challenge in the instant case, the trial court was following the holding of People v. Roerman (1961) 189 Cal. App.2 1988Section 170.6, subdivision (2), provides in part that when the parties know the identity of the judge or commissioner "assigned to or who is scheduled to" hear a matter at least 10 days before the date set for hearing, a challenge is untimely unless made at least 5 days before the hearing. [2] When a party files a motion and calendars it for hearing in a specified department of the superior court, is the judge's identity "known" for purposes of that provision? *93 In striking the challenge in the instant case, the trial court was following the holding of People v. Roerman (1961) 189 Cal. App.2 | 2 | 2 |
Andre v. General Dynamics, Inc.green2 sentences1987(Andre v. General Dynamics, Inc. (1974) 43 Cal.App.3d 839, 845-846 [ 118 Cal.Rptr. 95 ]; 6 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Proceedings Without Trial, § 203, p. 509.) “Obviously, where the court itself initiates a motion to dismiss, due process demands notice to the plaintiff adequate to defend against the charge of procrastination.” (Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 554, 561, fn. 7 [ 194 Cal.Rptr. 773 , 669 P.2d 9 ].) A defendant seeking to dismiss an action under the discretionary dismissal provisions must serve and file notice of motion “at least 45 days before the 1987(Andre v. General Dynamics, Inc. (1974) 43 Cal.App.3d 839, 845-846 [ 118 Cal.Rptr. 95 ]; 6 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Proceedings Without Trial, § 203, p. 509.) “Obviously, where the court itself initiates a motion to dismiss, due process demands notice to the plaintiff adequate to defend against the charge of procrastination.” (Wilson v. Sunshine Meat & Liquor Co. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 554, 561, fn. 7 [ 194 Cal.Rptr. 773 , 669 P.2d 9 ].) A defendant seeking to dismiss an action under the discretionary dismissal provisions must serve and file notice of motion “at least 45 days before the | 2 | 2 |
In Re Giovanni F.green2 sentences2023(In re Giovanni F. (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 594, 604 .) “In order to obtain a motion for a continuance of the hearing, written notice shall be filed at least two court days prior to the date set for hearing, together with affidavits or declarations detailing specific facts showing that a continuance is necessary, unless the court for good cause entertains an oral motion for continuance.” (Welf. & Inst. 2023(In re Giovanni F. (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 594, 604 .) “In order to obtain a motion for a continuance of the hearing, written notice shall be filed at least two court days prior to the date set for hearing, together with affidavits or declarations detailing specific facts showing that a continuance is necessary, unless the court for good cause entertains an oral motion for continuance.” (Welf. & Inst. | 1 | 6 |
In Re Karla C.green2 sentences2022Subdivision (a)(3) of section 352 provides: “In order to obtain a motion for a continuance of the hearing, written notice shall be filed at least two court days prior to the date set for hearing, together with affidavits or declarations detailing specific facts showing that a continuance is necessary, unless the court for good cause entertains an oral motion for continuance.” (§ 352, subd. (a)(3); see also, Cal.Rules of Ct., rule 5.550(a)(4).) The juvenile court may continue a dependency hearing at a parent’s request for good cause shown. (§ 352, subd. (a).) “Courts have interpreted this polic 2022Subdivision (a)(3) of section 352 provides: “In order to obtain a motion for a continuance of the hearing, written notice shall be filed at least two court days prior to the date set for hearing, together with affidavits or declarations detailing specific facts showing that a continuance is necessary, unless the court for good cause entertains an oral motion for continuance.” (§ 352, subd. (a)(3); see also, Cal.Rules of Ct., rule 5.550(a)(4).) The juvenile court may continue a dependency hearing at a parent’s request for good cause shown. (§ 352, subd. (a).) “Courts have interpreted this polic | 1 | 2 |
Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. T.E.green1 sentence2026Third, neither father nor father’s counsel introduced into evidence any documentation establishing that the department had attempted to coerce him into waiving his constitutional rights.12 Fourth, father failed to file a motion for a continuance, in writing, at least two court days prior to the date set for the hearing, “together with affidavits or declarations detailing specific facts showing that a continuance is necessary, unless the court for good cause entertains an oral motion for continuance.” (§ 352, subd. (a)(3).) Thus, father failed to establish good cause for the continuance, and th | 1 | 1 |
Cohen v. Hughes Markets, Inc.green2 sentences2024“A party seeking dismissal of a case [for lack of prosecution] under Code of Civil Procedure sections 583.410-583.430 must serve and file a notice of motion at least 45 days before the date set for hearing of the motion.” (Rule 3.1342(a), italics added; see also Cohen, supra, 36 Cal.App.4th at p. 1699 [construing former rule 373]; Franklin, supra, 148 Cal.App.4th at pp. 213–214 [former rule 373 “prescribes no less than 45 days’ notice of any motion to dismiss for delay in prosecution”].) Eric’s oral request for dismissal at the continued trial readiness conference and OSC hearing did not compo 2024“A party seeking dismissal of a case [for lack of prosecution] under Code of Civil Procedure sections 583.410-583.430 must serve and file a notice of motion at least 45 days before the date set for hearing of the motion.” (Rule 3.1342(a), italics added; see also Cohen, supra, 36 Cal.App.4th at p. 1699 [construing former rule 373]; Franklin, supra, 148 Cal.App.4th at pp. 213–214 [former rule 373 “prescribes no less than 45 days’ notice of any motion to dismiss for delay in prosecution”].) Eric’s oral request for dismissal at the continued trial readiness conference and OSC hearing did not compo | 1 | 1 |
MANSOURI v. Superior Courtgreen1 sentence2022(Mansouri v. Superior Court (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 633, 640 (Mansouri).) The party opposing arbitration bears the burden of proving any defense to arbitration. | 1 | 1 |
In Re David H.green1 sentence2021In order to obtain a motion for a continuance of the hearing, written notice shall be filed at least two court days prior to the date set for hearing, together with affidavits or declarations detailing specific facts showing that a continuance is necessary, unless the court for good cause entertains an oral motion for continuance.” (§ 352, subd. (a)(1)–(2).) A court may continue any hearing in dependency proceedings, including a section 366.26 hearing. (§ 352, subd. (a); see also In re Michael R. (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 687, 694 .) However, “[c]ontinuances in juvenile dependency proceedings are d | 1 | 1 |
In Re Michael R.green1 sentence2021In order to obtain a motion for a continuance of the hearing, written notice shall be filed at least two court days prior to the date set for hearing, together with affidavits or declarations detailing specific facts showing that a continuance is necessary, unless the court for good cause entertains an oral motion for continuance.” (§ 352, subd. (a)(1)–(2).) A court may continue any hearing in dependency proceedings, including a section 366.26 hearing. (§ 352, subd. (a); see also In re Michael R. (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 687, 694 .) However, “[c]ontinuances in juvenile dependency proceedings are d | 1 | 1 |
Garcia v. McCutchengreen1 sentence2016(Garcia v. McCutchen (1997) 16 Cal.4th 469, 482, fn. 10 .) Fa'Alofa makes no such showing. | 1 | 1 |
| Smith v. Adventist Health System/Westgreen | 1 | 1 |
| DIAL 800 v. Fesbindergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Kohn v. Superior Courtgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Bambula v. Superior Courtgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Gulf Coast Investment Corp. v. NASA 1 Business Centergreen | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Escobedogreen | 1 | 1 |
| Sambrano v. Superior Courtgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Eagle Maintenance & Supply Co. v. Superior Courtgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Schlumpf v. Superior Court of Trinity Countygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Clark v. Superior Courtgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Silva v. Bairgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Welden v. Davis Auto Exchangegreen | 1 | 1 |
| City of Port Hueneme v. City of Oxnardgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In re Difference & Controversy between E. M. Derby & Co. & City of Modestogreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Los Angeles County v. E.C
green
2 sentences2025(In re B.C. (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 129, 143-144 .) We “ ‘consider all the 15 evidence, draw all reasonable inferences, and resolve all evidentiary conflicts, in a light most favorable to the trial court’s ruling.’ ” (In re Robert L. (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 1057, 1067 .) In this case, the juvenile court acted within its discretion in refusing to continue the hearing. 2021In considering the minor’s interests, the court shall give substantial weight to a minor’s need for prompt resolution of his or her custody 12 status, the need to provide children with stable environments, and the damage to a minor of prolonged temporary placements.” Subdivision (a)(2) of section 352 provides that “Continuances shall be granted only upon a showing of good cause and only for that period of time shown to be necessary.” Subdivision (a)(3) further provides, “In order to obtain a motion for a continuance of the hearing, written notice shall be filed at least two court days prior to | 5 | 2021–2025 |
San Joaquin County Department of Human Services v. Gary L.
green
2 sentences2025(In re B.C. (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 129, 143-144 .) We “ ‘consider all the 15 evidence, draw all reasonable inferences, and resolve all evidentiary conflicts, in a light most favorable to the trial court’s ruling.’ ” (In re Robert L. (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 1057, 1067 .) In this case, the juvenile court acted within its discretion in refusing to continue the hearing. 2025(In re B.C. (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 129, 143-144 .) We “ ‘consider all the 13 evidence, draw all reasonable inferences, and resolve all evidentiary conflicts, in a light most favorable to the trial court’s ruling.’ ” (In re Robert L. (1993) 21 Cal.App.4th 1057, 1066 .) Here, the juvenile court acted well within its discretion in denying mother’s request to continue the hearing. | 4 | 2024–2025 |
Franklin Capital Corp. v. Wilson
green
1 sentence2024“A party seeking dismissal of a case [for lack of prosecution] under Code of Civil Procedure sections 583.410-583.430 must serve and file a notice of motion at least 45 days before the date set for hearing of the motion.” (Rule 3.1342(a), italics added; see also Cohen, supra, 36 Cal.App.4th at p. 1699 [construing former rule 373]; Franklin, supra, 148 Cal.App.4th at pp. 213–214 [former rule 373 “prescribes no less than 45 days’ notice of any motion to dismiss for delay in prosecution”].) Eric’s oral request for dismissal at the continued trial readiness conference and OSC hearing did not compo | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Tucker
green
1 sentence2023“Health quarantines to prevent the spread of infectious diseases have long been recognized as good cause for continuing a trial date.” (People v. Breceda (2022) 76 Cal.App.5th 71 , 91; Stanley v. Superior Court (2011) 50 Cal.App.5th 164 , 169.) Indeed, good cause exists when an incarcerated defendant is “under quarantine to prevent the spread of infectious disease.” (People v. Tucker (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 1313, 1314 .) Considering the information before the trial court regarding Linthecome’s health status, we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in finding good cause to continue t | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In Re Marriage of Hoffmeister
green
1 sentence2023For example, in Hoffmeister, the appellant seeking the continuance had received the other party’s amended financial statement only a few days before the date set for hearing, and the appellate court held that the denial of a continuance erroneously deprived the appellant of “an adequate opportunity to contest new claims advanced . . . at virtually the last moment.” (Hoffmeister, supra, 161 Cal.App.3d at p. 1170 .) Here, by contrast, Yang had ample notice of the impending trial to explore her options for a continuance, and at a minimum was aware that the trial was scheduled to go forward (notwi | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Rhoades
green
1 sentence2023(People v. Rhoades (2019) 8 Cal.5th 393, 451 .) Here, the trial court based its finding of good cause on the declaration of the doctor who indicated Linthecome had tested positive for COVID and could not be physically transported to court on the date set for hearing. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Cole
green
1 sentence2022Whenever any continuance is granted, the facts proven which require the continuance shall be entered upon the minutes of the court.” (§ 352, subd. (a)(2).) “In order to obtain a motion for a continuance of the hearing, written notice shall be filed at least two court days prior to the date set for hearing, together with affidavits or declarations detailing specific facts showing that a continuance is necessary, unless the court for good cause entertains an oral motion for continuance.” (§ 352, subd. (a)(3).) “What constitutes good cause is a matter within the court’s discretion, and its determ | 1 | 2022–2022 |
JEFF M. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
green
1 sentence2022(In re Karla C. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 166, 179-180 .) “Discretion is abused when a decision is arbitrary, capricious or patently absurd and results in a manifest miscarriage of justice.” (Ibid.) “The juvenile dependency statutory scheme requires that petitions under section 300 be heard, and decided rapidly. [Citation.] Continuances are discouraged.” (In re Axsana S. (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 262, 272 , disapproved on other grounds In re Jesusa V. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 588 , 624, fn. 12.) “Continuances should be difficult to obtain.” (Jeff M. v. Superior Court (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 1238, 1242 .) B. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
In Re Axsana S.
green
1 sentence2022(In re Karla C. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 166, 179-180 .) “Discretion is abused when a decision is arbitrary, capricious or patently absurd and results in a manifest miscarriage of justice.” (Ibid.) “The juvenile dependency statutory scheme requires that petitions under section 300 be heard, and decided rapidly. [Citation.] Continuances are discouraged.” (In re Axsana S. (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 262, 272 , disapproved on other grounds In re Jesusa V. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 588 , 624, fn. 12.) “Continuances should be difficult to obtain.” (Jeff M. v. Superior Court (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 1238, 1242 .) B. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
In Re Jesusa
green
1 sentence2022(In re Karla C. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 166, 179-180 .) “Discretion is abused when a decision is arbitrary, capricious or patently absurd and results in a manifest miscarriage of justice.” (Ibid.) “The juvenile dependency statutory scheme requires that petitions under section 300 be heard, and decided rapidly. [Citation.] Continuances are discouraged.” (In re Axsana S. (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 262, 272 , disapproved on other grounds In re Jesusa V. (2004) 32 Cal.4th 588 , 624, fn. 12.) “Continuances should be difficult to obtain.” (Jeff M. v. Superior Court (1997) 56 Cal.App.4th 1238, 1242 .) B. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Orange County Social Services Agency v. C.B.
green
1 sentence2021(In re F.A. (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 107, 117 .) Mother’s counsel made no showing of good cause for the oral nature of her continuance request, and her attempted filing of a written motion the night before the hearing, even if not rejected for technical reasons, would have been untimely. (§ 352, subd. (a)(3).) Counsel offered no explanation as to why a timely written motion could not have been made earlier. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Robert W.
green
1 sentence2021“Although continuances are discouraged in dependency cases [citation], the juvenile court has discretion to grant a continuance upon a showing of good cause if it is not contrary to the best interest of the child. (§ 352, subd. (a).) We review the court’s ruling on a continuance request for an abuse of discretion. [Citation.]” (In re Mary B. (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 1474, 1481 .) “In order to obtain a motion for a continuance of the hearing, written notice shall be filed at least two court days prior to the date set for hearing, together with affidavits or declarations detailing specific facts s | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. Joseph A.
green
1 sentence2021An ICWA-020 form as to David, signed by David and filed on October 12, 2017, is part of the record. 14 provide children with stable environments, and the damage to a minor of prolonged temporary placements.’” (In re Abbigail A. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 83, 95 ; see § 352, subd. (a)(2) [“[c]ontinuances shall be granted only upon a showing of good cause and only for that period of time shown to be necessary by the evidence presented at the hearing on the motion for the continuance”]; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.550(a)(4) [“[i]n order to obtain a continuance, written notice with supporting documents must | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. D.B.
green
1 sentence2021An ICWA-020 form as to David, signed by David and filed on October 12, 2017, is part of the record. 14 provide children with stable environments, and the damage to a minor of prolonged temporary placements.’” (In re Abbigail A. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 83, 95 ; see § 352, subd. (a)(2) [“[c]ontinuances shall be granted only upon a showing of good cause and only for that period of time shown to be necessary by the evidence presented at the hearing on the motion for the continuance”]; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.550(a)(4) [“[i]n order to obtain a continuance, written notice with supporting documents must | 1 | 2021–2021 |
L. A. Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. D.Y. (In re D.Y.)
green
1 sentence2021An ICWA-020 form as to David, signed by David and filed on October 12, 2017, is part of the record. 14 provide children with stable environments, and the damage to a minor of prolonged temporary placements.’” (In re Abbigail A. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 83, 95 ; see § 352, subd. (a)(2) [“[c]ontinuances shall be granted only upon a showing of good cause and only for that period of time shown to be necessary by the evidence presented at the hearing on the motion for the continuance”]; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.550(a)(4) [“[i]n order to obtain a continuance, written notice with supporting documents must | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Elizabeth D.
green
1 sentence2021In considering the minor’s interests, the court shall give substantial weight to a minor’s need for prompt resolution of his or her custody 12 status, the need to provide children with stable environments, and the damage to a minor of prolonged temporary placements.” Subdivision (a)(2) of section 352 provides that “Continuances shall be granted only upon a showing of good cause and only for that period of time shown to be necessary.” Subdivision (a)(3) further provides, “In order to obtain a motion for a continuance of the hearing, written notice shall be filed at least two court days prior to | 1 | 2021–2021 |
People v. Sanchez
green
2 sentences2019Although Couthren’s counsel initially raised no objection to this procedure, on the date set for hearing he filed a motion in limine, seeking to exclude the expert evaluations on hearsay grounds in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Sanchez, supra, 63 Cal.4th 665 . 2019Although Couthren’s counsel initially raised no objection to this procedure, on the date set for hearing he filed a motion in limine, seeking to exclude the expert evaluations on hearsay grounds in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Sanchez, supra, 63 Cal.4th 665 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| Wipranik v. Sup. Ct. of Los Angeles Cty. green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| People v. Henderson green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| Sacks v. FSR Brokerage, Inc. green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| McComber v. Wells green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Sacramento County Department of Health & Human Services v. V.G. green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| In Re Ninfa S. green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| County of San Bernardino v. Superior Court green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| EDSEL P. v. Superior Court green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Villarruel v. Superior Court green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| In Re Marriage of Flaherty green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Durst v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County green | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| Cintrón v. Alvarez neutral | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| Benson v. Superior Court of Napa County green | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| McCarthy v. Mt. Tecarte Land & Water Co. green | 1 | 1966–1966 |
| Schilling v. Buhne neutral | 1 | 1963–1963 |
| Williams v. Board of Supervisors of Sacramento County neutral | 1 | 1927–1927 |
| Bliss v. Hamilton green | 1 | 1927–1927 |
| Ex parte Carson neutral | 1 | 1924–1924 |
| Tripp v. Tripp green | 1 | 1924–1924 |
| Berendsen v. Babdaty green | 1 | 1923–1923 |
| Coats v. Coats green | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.