Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1909–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of New Haven v. Indiana Suburban Sewers, Inc.green2 sentences1989See City of New Haven, supra 277 N.E.2d at 363 ; AFL-CIO v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co. (1983), Ind.App., 443 N.E.2d 1243, 1245 ; L.S. 1989See City of New Haven, supra 277 N.E.2d at 363 ; AFL-CIO v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co. (1983), Ind. App., 443 N.E.2d 1243, 1245 ; L.S. | 1 | 2 |
In Re State of Ohio Conviction Against Gamblergreen1 sentence2020(Emphasis added). [8] We have previously analyzed this statutory section and held that “the trial court must either summarily dismiss [the petition] or give notice to several government actors and set the matter for a hearing before proceeding.” In re State of Ohio Conviction Against Gambler, 939 N.E.2d 1128, 1131-32 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Atkinson v. City of Marion
green
1 sentence2009Id. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
AFL-CIO, Central Labor Council of Vanderburgh, Posey & Warrick Counties v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co.
green
2 sentences1989See City of New Haven, supra 277 N.E.2d at 363 ; AFL-CIO v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co. (1983), Ind.App., 443 N.E.2d 1243, 1245 ; L.S. 1989See City of New Haven, supra 277 N.E.2d at 363 ; AFL-CIO v. Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co. (1983), Ind. App., 443 N.E.2d 1243, 1245 ; L.S. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Smith v. State
green
2 sentences1977Otherwise the summons and the issuance and service thereof shall be as provided for by law and rules for civil cases." [5] The probable cause test for a warrantless arrest is, "... whether at the time of the arrest the facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the officers and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information were sufficient to warrant a prudent man of reasonable caution in believing that the arrestee had committed or was committing an offense." Smith v. State, supra, 256 Ind. at 607 , 271 N.E.2d at 136 . 1977Otherwise the summons and the issuance and service thereof shall be as provided for by law and rules for civil cases." [5] The probable cause test for a warrantless arrest is, "... whether at the time of the arrest the facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the officers and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information were sufficient to warrant a prudent man of reasonable caution in believing that the arrestee had committed or was committing an offense." Smith v. State, supra, 256 Ind. at 607 , 271 N.E.2d at 136 . | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Eureka Block Coal Co. v. Wells
green
1 sentence1929Appellant claims that the cases of Dye & Son v. Nichols (1923), 81 Ind. App. 13 , 141 N. E. 259 ; Eureka Block Coal Co. v. Wells (1925), 83 Ind. App. 181 , 147 N. E. *49 811; and Grasselli Chemical Co. v. Simon, supra, holding that the question of the jurisdiction of the Industrial Board must be raised by pleadings before the board were erroneously decided. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
T. J. Dye & Son v. Nichols
green
2 sentences1929Appellant claims that the cases of Dye & Son v. Nichols (1923), 81 Ind. App. 13 , 141 N. E. 259 ; Eureka Block Coal Co. v. Wells (1925), 83 Ind. App. 181 , 147 N. E. *49 811; and Grasselli Chemical Co. v. Simon, supra, holding that the question of the jurisdiction of the Industrial Board must be raised by pleadings before the board were erroneously decided. 1929Appellant claims that the cases of Dye & Son v. Nichols (1923), 81 Ind. App. 13 , 141 N. E. 259 ; Eureka Block Coal Co. v. Wells (1925), 83 Ind. App. 181 , 147 N. E. *49 811; and Grasselli Chemical Co. v. Simon, supra, holding that the question of the jurisdiction of the Industrial Board must be raised by pleadings before the board were erroneously decided. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Carnahan v. State ex rel. Eads
green
2 sentences1912But the case of Carnahan v. State, ex rel. (1900), 155 Ind. 156 , 57 N. E. 717 , seems to hold that withdrawals from petitions for change or relocation of a schoolhouse may be made at any time before the superintendent acts on the petition, yet in that case it does not appear that the day of hearing was ever postponed, or that the withdrawals were filed after the day first set for hearing, as in the present case. 1912But the case of Carnahan v. State, ex rel. (1900), 155 Ind. 156 , 57 N. E. 717 , seems to hold that withdrawals from petitions for change or relocation of a schoolhouse may be made at any time before the superintendent acts on the petition, yet in that case it does not appear that the day of hearing was ever postponed, or that the withdrawals were filed after the day first set for hearing, as in the present case. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Black v. Campbell
green
1 sentence1909Black v. Campbell (1887), 112 Ind. 122, 126 . | 1 | 1909–1909 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.