straightforward rule (New York) · Go Syfert
← New York issues

straightforward rule in New York

7 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Gilliangreen
ny · 2006 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025In People v Gillian , the defendant "moved in writing for reassignment of counsel or, in the alternative, the opportunity to proceed pro se," after he previously informed the court that he wanted to proceed pro se based on dissatisfaction with defense counsel (8 NY3d 85, 87 [2006]).

2025In People v Gillian , the defendant "moved in writing for reassignment of counsel or, in the alternative, the opportunity to proceed pro se," after he previously informed the court that he wanted to proceed pro se based on dissatisfaction with defense counsel ( 8 NY3d 85, 87 [2006]).

11
Aviles v. City of New Yorkgreen
nyappdiv · 1994 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014Moreover, the plaintiff, at her 50-h hearing, identified, to some extent, the names of some of the officers involved in the incident (see Aviles v City of New York, 202 AD2d 530, 531 [2d Dept 1994]; see also Kim L. v Port Jervis City School Dist., 40 AD3d 1042, 1044 [2d Dept 2007] [“Whether or not the notice of claim is sufficient depends upon the circumstances of the case, and the court, in making such a determination, may consider the testimony provided during a General Municipal Law § 50-h examination and any other evidence properly before the court” (citations omitted)]).

11
Kravatz v. County of Suffolkgreen
nyappdiv · 2007 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
1 sentence

2014Moreover, the plaintiff, at her 50-h hearing, identified, to some extent, the names of some of the officers involved in the incident (see Aviles v City of New York, 202 AD2d 530, 531 [2d Dept 1994]; see also Kim L. v Port Jervis City School Dist., 40 AD3d 1042, 1044 [2d Dept 2007] [“Whether or not the notice of claim is sufficient depends upon the circumstances of the case, and the court, in making such a determination, may consider the testimony provided during a General Municipal Law § 50-h examination and any other evidence properly before the court” (citations omitted)]).

11
Dobkin v. Chapmangreen
ny · 1968 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
1 sentence

2008As we stated in Dobkin v Chapman ( 21 NY2d 490, 501 [1968]), the words of CPLR 313 are “clear and unqualified; service may be made without the State ... ‘in the same manner as service is made within the state.’ ” This straightforward rule advances the statute’s purpose: “[T]he joint report of the Senate and Assembly committees . . . noted, in so many words, that service outside of New York . . . could be effected ‘in any manner that is permitted within the state’ and that ‘[t]he permissive methods of service without the state have been increased in order to enhance the possibility of acquiring

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Vargas green
ny · 1996
1 sentence

2024Thus, it is Judge Singas—not this Court—who “misses” the relevant point (id.) that here, as in Vargas, defendant’s intent was “easily inferred from the commission of the act[s] [themsel[ves]” as recounted by complainants in a case that boiled down to a credibility contest for the jury to evaluate ( 88 NY2d at 858 ).

12024–2024
Patton v. Malychev green
nyappdiv · 2015
2 sentences

2017"Residence means living in a particular place, while domicile means living in that locality with intent to make it a fixed and permanent home" (<a href="../2015/2015_07633.htm" target="_blank"><i>Patton v. Malychev</i>, 132 AD3d 829 </a>, 830 [2d Dept., 2015] (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)).</p> <p>It is undisputed that Deripaska was born in Russia, and Russia is his domicile of origin.

2017"Residence means living in a particular place, while domicile means living in that locality with intent to make it a fixed and permanent home" (<a href="../2015/2015_07633.htm" target="_blank"><i>Patton v. Malychev</i>, 132 AD3d 829</a>, 830 [2d Dept., 2015] (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)).</p> <p>It is undisputed that Deripaska was born in Russia, and Russia is his domicile of origin.

12017–2017
Alliance of American Insurers v. Chu green
ny · 1991
1 sentence

2016Insurers, 77 NY2d at 586 ).

12016–2016
Antinore v. Genesee County Local Conditional Release Commission green
nysupct · 1990
2 sentences

1996Lastly, our New York State Supreme Court’s handling of Antinore v Genesee County Local Conditional Release Commn. ( 146 Misc 2d 520 ), relied upon significantly by the majority, is plainly distinguishable and in no event binding on this Court.

1996Lastly, our New York State Supreme Court's handling of Antinore v Genesee County Local Conditional Release Commn. ( 146 Misc 2d 520 ), relied upon significantly by the majority, is plainly distinguishable and in no event binding on this Court.

11996–1996

Where else courts name it

CA 25 (1979–2025) PA 13 (1984–2026) MI 13 (1976–2023) TX 13 (1982–2024) IL 12 (1991–2019) NJ 10 (1984–2026) VT 7 (1996–2022) WA 7 (1994–2026) NY 7 (1996–2025) DE 6 (2007–2026) NM 5 (2007–2025) LA 5 (1994–2025) WI 4 (2000–2024) NC 4 (1984–2019) GA 4 (2011–2024) MD 4 (1996–2026) MN 4 (1999–2026) OR 3 (1986–2003) VA 3 (2023–2025) MA 3 (1974–2017) WV 3 (1983–2020) OH 3 (2019–2025) KS 2 (2014–2022) FL 2 (1981–2025) NE 2 (1990–1993) KY 2 (2020–2021) MO 2 (1981–2003) ID 2 (2022–2022) AR 2 (2005–2024) IN 2 (1983–2020) DC 2 (2008–2020) UT 2 (2005–2023) IA 2 (2019–2022) SC 2 (2017–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check