general statutory rule (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

general statutory rule in Ohio

7 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
IndyMac Bank, FSB v. Bridgesgreen
ohioctapp · 2006 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
2 sentences

2007See, e.g., IndyMac Bank, FSB v. Bridges, 169 Ohio App.3d 389 , 2006-Ohio-5742 , 863 N.E.2d 185, ¶ 13 .

2007See, e.g., IndyMac Bank, FSB v. Bridges, 169 Ohio App.3d 389 , 2006-Ohio-5742 , 863 N.E.2d 185, ¶ 13 .

11
In Re W.A., Unpublished Decision (11-2-2006)green
ohioctapp · 2006 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
1 sentence

2007See, e.g., IndyMac Bank, FSB v. Bridges, 169 Ohio App.3d 389 , 2006-Ohio-5742 , 863 N.E.2d 185, ¶ 13 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Jones green
ohio · 1980
2 sentences

2009Equitable subrogation “ ‘arises by operation of law when one having a liability or right or a fiduciary relation in the premises pays a debt by another under such circumstances that he is in equity entitled to the security or obligation held by the creditor whom he has paid.’ ” State v. Jones (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 99, 102 , 15 O.O.3d 132 , 399 N.E.2d 1215 , quoting Fed.

2009Equitable subrogation “ ‘arises by operation of law when one having a liability or right or a fiduciary relation in the premises pays a debt by another under such circumstances that he is in equity entitled to the security or obligation held by the creditor whom he has paid.’ ” State v. Jones (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 99, 102 , 15 O.O.3d 132 , 399 N.E.2d 1215 , quoting Fed.

22007–2009
Sharon Village Ltd. v. Licking County Board of Revision green
ohio · 1997
2 sentences

2016Id.

2016Id.

12016–2016
Brady v. Bucyrus Police Department green
ohioctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2015Brady, 2011-Ohio-2460, at ¶ 47 , citing Maggio v. City of Warren, 11th Dist.

12015–2015
Wallace v. Nally neutral
ohioctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2015No. 14CO35 , 2015-Ohio-497 (dismissing the appeal from the Director’s grant of Tervita’s annual permit because the appeal should have been filed in the Tenth District). {¶28} The general statutory standard of review is to determine if the order is supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence and is in accordance with -8- law.

12015–2015
Maggio v. Warren, Unpublished Decision (12-22-2006) green
ohioctapp · 2006
1 sentence

2011Maggio, 2006-Ohio-6880 , 2006 WL 3772258 , ¶ 38.

12011–2011
Washington Mutual Bank, FA v. Aultman green
ohioctapp · 2007
2 sentences

2009Bank, FA v. Aultman, 172 Ohio App.3d 584 , 2007-Ohio-3706 , 876 N.E.2d 617 . {¶ 16} “In some circumstances, the doctrine of equitable subrogation can overcome the general statutory rule.” Id. at ¶ 24.

2009Bank, FA v. Aultman, 172 Ohio App.3d 584 , 2007-Ohio-3706 , 876 N.E.2d 617 . {¶ 16} “In some circumstances, the doctrine of equitable subrogation can overcome the general statutory rule.” Id. at ¶ 24.

12009–2009

Where else courts name it

CA 22 (1898–2025) KS 21 (1984–2024) WI 10 (1962–2008) OH 7 (2007–2016) MA 7 (1964–2019) GA 7 (1938–2025) NY 5 (1889–2010) IL 5 (1972–2022) TX 4 (2004–2007) UT 3 (1988–1992) OR 3 (1968–2012) IA 3 (1944–1947) MO 3 (1902–1998) WV 3 (1981–2024) MN 3 (1933–2004) AZ 2 (2005–2023) MI 2 (2017–2017) IN 2 (1995–2000) RI 2 (1996–1996) MD 2 (1901–1966) ME 2 (1982–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check