released claim (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

released claim in Ohio

7 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
ABM Farms, Inc. v. Woodsgreen
ohio · 1998 · cited in 3 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2017–2019
2 sentences

2019Examples include a party to a release misrepresenting the economic value of the released claim, or one party employing coercion or duress to cause the other party to sign an agreement.” 81 Ohio St.3d at 503 , 692 N.E.2d at 578 (emphasis added).

2019Examples include a party to a release misrepresenting the economic value of the released claim, or one party employing coercion or duress to cause the other party to sign an agreement.” 81 Ohio St.3d at 503 , 692 N.E.2d at 578 (emphasis added).

23

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Haller v. Borror Corp. green
ohio · 1990
2 sentences

2003Beer v. Griffith (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 119 , 123 , 15 Ohio Op.3d 157, 160 , 399 N.E.2d 1227 , 1231.* * * {¶ 36} "A classic claim of fraudulent inducement asserts that a misrepresentation of facts outside the contract or other wrongful conduct induced a party to enter into the contract: Examples include a party to a release misrepresenting the economic value of the released claim, or one party employing coercion or duress to cause the other party to sign an agreement." Haller 50 Ohio St.3d at 14 , 552 N.E.2d at 211 . {¶ 37} Here, appellant has made only conclusory statements in her appellate br

2003Beer v. Griffith (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 119 , 123 , 15 Ohio Op.3d 157, 160 , 399 N.E.2d 1227 , 1231.* * * {¶ 36} "A classic claim of fraudulent inducement asserts that a misrepresentation of facts outside the contract or other wrongful conduct induced a party to enter into the contract: Examples include a party to a release misrepresenting the economic value of the released claim, or one party employing coercion or duress to cause the other party to sign an agreement." Haller 50 Ohio St.3d at 14 , 552 N.E.2d at 211 . {¶ 37} Here, appellant has made only conclusory statements in her appellate br

41998–2018
Beer v. Griffith green
ohio · 1980
2 sentences

2017Beer v. Griffith, 61 Ohio St.2d at 123, 399 N.E.2d 1227 . 9. {¶ 27} “A classic claim of fraudulent inducement asserts that a misrepresentation of facts outside the contract or other wrongful conduct induced a party to enter into the contract: Examples include a party to a release misrepresenting the economic value of the released claim, or one party employing coercion or duress to cause the other party to sign an agreement.” Abm Farms v. Woods, 81 Ohio St.3d 498, 502-504 , 692 N.E.2d 574 (1998). {¶ 28} Here, appellant does not argue, or proffer evidence to support a claim, that appellee made m

2003Beer v. Griffith (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 119 , 123 , 15 Ohio Op.3d 157, 160 , 399 N.E.2d 1227 , 1231.* * * {¶ 36} "A classic claim of fraudulent inducement asserts that a misrepresentation of facts outside the contract or other wrongful conduct induced a party to enter into the contract: Examples include a party to a release misrepresenting the economic value of the released claim, or one party employing coercion or duress to cause the other party to sign an agreement." Haller 50 Ohio St.3d at 14 , 552 N.E.2d at 211 . {¶ 37} Here, appellant has made only conclusory statements in her appellate br

22003–2017
Picklesimer v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. green
· 1949
1 sentence

2014Picklesimer, 151 Ohio St. at 7 .

12014–2014

Where else courts name it

TX 7 (1979–2025) OH 7 (1998–2019) CA 5 (1999–2021) DE 2 (2023–2025) WA 2 (2024–2026) NY 2 (1891–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check