Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Doggett v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2024Total Speedy-Trial Days Counted: 241 days (18 + 119 + 2 + 33 + 69) Relevant Constitutional Speedy-Trial Law {¶ 47} “ ‘To determine whether a defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated, a court should apply the four-factor balancing test adopted by the United States Supreme Court in [Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972)].’ ” State v. Hart, 2022-Ohio-4550, ¶ 90 (2d Dist.), quoting State v. Wagner, 2021-Ohio-1671, ¶ 14 (2d Dist.). “ ‘The factors include: (1) the length of the delay “between accusation and trial”; (2) the reason for the delay; (3) the defendant’s assertio | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hartgreen1 sentence2024Total Speedy-Trial Days Counted: 241 days (18 + 119 + 2 + 33 + 69) Relevant Constitutional Speedy-Trial Law {¶ 47} “ ‘To determine whether a defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated, a court should apply the four-factor balancing test adopted by the United States Supreme Court in [Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972)].’ ” State v. Hart, 2022-Ohio-4550, ¶ 90 (2d Dist.), quoting State v. Wagner, 2021-Ohio-1671, ¶ 14 (2d Dist.). “ ‘The factors include: (1) the length of the delay “between accusation and trial”; (2) the reason for the delay; (3) the defendant’s assertio | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wagnergreen2 sentences2024Total Speedy-Trial Days Counted: 241 days (18 + 119 + 2 + 33 + 69) Relevant Constitutional Speedy-Trial Law {¶ 47} “ ‘To determine whether a defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated, a court should apply the four-factor balancing test adopted by the United States Supreme Court in [Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972)].’ ” State v. Hart, 2022-Ohio-4550, ¶ 90 (2d Dist.), quoting State v. Wagner, 2021-Ohio-1671, ¶ 14 (2d Dist.). “ ‘The factors include: (1) the length of the delay “between accusation and trial”; (2) the reason for the delay; (3) the defendant’s assertio 2024Total Speedy-Trial Days Counted: 241 days (18 + 119 + 2 + 33 + 69) Relevant Constitutional Speedy-Trial Law {¶ 47} “ ‘To determine whether a defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated, a court should apply the four-factor balancing test adopted by the United States Supreme Court in [Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972)].’ ” State v. Hart, 2022-Ohio-4550, ¶ 90 (2d Dist.), quoting State v. Wagner, 2021-Ohio-1671, ¶ 14 (2d Dist.). “ ‘The factors include: (1) the length of the delay “between accusation and trial”; (2) the reason for the delay; (3) the defendant’s assertio | 1 | 1 |
Froehlich v. Ohio Department of Mental Healthgreen1 sentence2021See Froehlich v. Ohio Dept. of Mental Health, 114 Ohio St.3d 286 , 2007-Ohio-4161 , ¶ 10 (“The tort of malicious prosecution in a criminal setting requires proof of three essential elements: (1) malice in instituting or continuing the prosecution, (2) lack of probable cause, and (3) termination of the prosecution in favor of the accused.”) (Internal quotations and citation omitted.). {¶7} On appeal, Ms. Sweeney has not challenged the trial court’s finding that her claim for malicious prosecution fails because her complaint demonstrates that probable cause supported the filing of the charge aga | 1 | 1 |
Paterson v. Equity Trust Co.green1 sentence2012See, e.g., Paterson v. Equity Trust Co., 9th Dist. 11CA009993, 2012-Ohio-860, ¶ 18 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Allengreen1 sentence1999See, e.g., State v. Allen (1996), 77 Ohio St.3d 172, 173 , 672 N.E.2d 638 , 639-640. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. Wingo
green
1 sentence2024Total Speedy-Trial Days Counted: 241 days (18 + 119 + 2 + 33 + 69) Relevant Constitutional Speedy-Trial Law {¶ 47} “ ‘To determine whether a defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated, a court should apply the four-factor balancing test adopted by the United States Supreme Court in [Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972)].’ ” State v. Hart, 2022-Ohio-4550, ¶ 90 (2d Dist.), quoting State v. Wagner, 2021-Ohio-1671, ¶ 14 (2d Dist.). “ ‘The factors include: (1) the length of the delay “between accusation and trial”; (2) the reason for the delay; (3) the defendant’s assertio | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Sweeney
green
1 sentence2019Id. at 772 . {¶ 82} This Court in Sweeney concluded: In order to prove this charge against Sweeney, the state had to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Sweeney was not relieved from disability as provided in R.C. 2923.14, that he knowingly acquired, had, carried, or used a firearm, and that he was under indictment for or had been convicted of any felony of violence, or had been adjudged a juvenile delinquent for commission of any such felony. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Fanning
green
2 sentences2012State v. DePew, 38 Ohio St.3d 275, 277 , 528 N.E.2d 542 (1988); State v. Fanning, 1 Ohio St.3d 19, 20 , 437 N.E.2d 583 (1982). 2012State v. DePew, 38 Ohio St.3d 275, 277 , 528 N.E.2d 542 (1988); State v. Fanning, 1 Ohio St.3d 19, 20 , 437 N.E.2d 583 (1982). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. DePew
green
2 sentences2012State v. DePew, 38 Ohio St.3d 275, 277 , 528 N.E.2d 542 (1988); State v. Fanning, 1 Ohio St.3d 19, 20 , 437 N.E.2d 583 (1982). 2012State v. DePew, 38 Ohio St.3d 275, 277 , 528 N.E.2d 542 (1988); State v. Fanning, 1 Ohio St.3d 19, 20 , 437 N.E.2d 583 (1982). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. Adams
green
1 sentence1999"Under Civ.R. 60(B), a movant's burden is only to allege a meritorious defense, not to prove that he will prevail on that defense." Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. Adams, supra at 20 , 520 N.E.2d at 566 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.