Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Buell
green
2 sentences2024In Buell, the Ohio Supreme Court held that a psychologist may testify as an expert under Evid.R. 702 “concerning the variables or factors that may impair the accuracy of a typical eyewitness identification.” Id. at 131 . [Emphasis in original]. 2000The Ohio Supreme Court has held that expert testimony concerning "the variables or factors that may impair the accuracy of a typical eyewitness identification is admissible under Evid.R. 702." State v. Buell (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 124 , paragraph one of the syllabus. | 6 | 1988–2024 |
David W. McKay v. Texas
green
2 sentences1999State v. Buell (1986), 22 Ohio St.3d 124 , paragraph four of the syllabus, certiorari denied (1986), 479 U.S. 871 . 1988In State v. Buell (1986), 22 Ohio St. 3d 124, 131 , 22 OBR 203, 209, 489 N.E. 2d 795, 803 , certiorari denied (1986), 479 U.S. 871 , this court stated: “[T]he expert testimony of an experimental psychologist concerning the variables or factors that may impair. the accuracy of a typical eyewitness identification is admissible under Evid. | 2 | 1988–1999 |
People v. McDonald
green
1 sentence1986The court concluded, however, that the variables or factors about which psychologists could testify are “ ‘sufficiently beyond common experience’ that in appropriate cases expert opinion thereon could at least ‘assist the trier of fact * * *.' ” Id. at 248, 690 P. 2d at 721 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.