7 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1974–1980 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
White v. Stategreen2 sentences1977See White v. State, Okl.Cr., 520 P.2d 368 (1974). 1974It is a limited exception in this regard that when defense counsel stipulates that former convictions are defendant’s convictions, or when defendant under oath confesses the former convictions, there is no question of fact, within the jury’s province, of whether defendant is guilty for the primary offense of the offense charged with former convictions.” Also see White v. State, Okl.Cr., 520 P.2d 368 (1974). | 3 | 4 |
City of Pond Creek v. Haskellgreen2 sentences1975See, City of Pond Creek v. Haskell, 21 Okl. 711 , 97 P. 338 (1908), containing an expanded discussion of this section of the Oklahoma Constitution. 1975See, City of Pond Creek v. Haskell, 21 Okl. 711 , 97 P. 338 (1908), containing an expanded discussion of this section of the Oklahoma Constitution. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Neal v. State
green
1 sentence1980Defendant first urges in this regard that the instruction was so confusing and complicated as to be reversible error, within Neal v. State, Okl.Cr., 597 P.2d 334 (1979). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Stake v. United States
green
1 sentence1975No penalty shall be imposed under section 6653 for any offense to which this section is applicable.” In Stake v. United States, D.C.Minn., 347 F.Supp. 823 (1972), the court said: “The two elements necessary to make § 6672 applicable to a taxpayer are: (1) the individual person had the authority to direct or control the payment of corporate funds and (2) such a responsible person willfully failed to comply with the tax withholding statutes. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.