Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2019–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences2019As to Langford's claim that denying his discovery request in this regard was error and a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), this claim was raised on direct appeal, and it is the law of the case that this claim lacks merit. 2019As to Langford's claim that denying his discovery request in this regard was error and a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), this claim was raised on direct appeal, and it is the law of the case that this claim lacks merit. | 4 | 2019–2019 |
People v. Manriquez
green
1 sentence2024Id. at 361 & n.30. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.