defendant for a traffic violation (Oregon) · Go Syfert
← Oregon issues

defendant for a traffic violation in Oregon

7 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Toevs green
or · 1998
2 sentences

2006In State v. Toevs, 327 Or 525 , 964 P2d 1007 (1998), for example, an officer stopped the defendant for a traffic violation and, after taking the defendant’s license, “ran a check” on it, then returned it and told the defendant that “he was free to go.” Id. at 528-29 .

2006In State v. Toevs, 327 Or 525 , 964 P2d 1007 (1998), for example, an officer stopped the defendant for a traffic violation and, after taking the defendant’s license, “ran a check” on it, then returned it and told the defendant that “he was free to go.” Id. at 528-29 .

22006–2014
State v. Oller green
orctapp · 2016
2 sentences

2020In Oller, the officer stopped the defendant for a traffic violation after noticing that the defendant’s passen- ger was a known drug user that was on probation for drug crimes. 277 Or App at 530-31 .

2020After he finished processing the traffic violation, the officer lawfully observed syringes in the pocket of the defendant’s driver’s side door that “were of a type that intravenous drug users typically use.” Id.

12020–2020
State v. Bates green
or · 1987
1 sentence

2019Id. at 521-22 .

12019–2019
State v. Barber green
orccmarion · 2016
1 sentence

2016After receiving this information, a second officer stopped the defendant for a traffic violation; before coming to a stop, the defendant slowly drove through a parking lot “while watching his passenger fumble under the seat.” Id.

12016–2016
State v. Dominguez-Martinez green
or · 1995
1 sentence

2014And, in each case, the Supreme Court concluded that the officer’s conduct after telling the defendant that he was free to go constituted an unlawful extension of the traffic stop and that the defendant’s consent and the evidence resulting from it were tainted and had to be suppressed. 7 Toevs, 327 Or at 537-38 ; Dominguez-Martinez, 321 Or at 214 .

12014–2014
State v. Frias green
orctapp · 2009
1 sentence

2012Id. at 62 .

12012–2012
State v. McMullen green
orctapp · 2012
1 sentence

2012There, a state trooper stopped the defendant for a traffic violation and, after talking with her, developed probable cause to believe that she had been driving under the influence of intoxicants. 250 Or App at 209 .

12012–2012

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OR § Or. Rev. Stat. § 475.890 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OR 7 (2006–2020) TX 5 (2004–2021) LA 5 (1986–2018) OH 5 (2010–2025) TN 4 (1976–2012) NC 3 (2002–2010) PA 3 (2015–2023) KS 3 (2008–2026) IL 3 (1975–2009) NJ 2 (2017–2018) MN 2 (1998–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check