Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2024 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Snyder v. Snydergreen2 sentences2024See Snyder v. Snyder, 629 A.2d 977 , 980 n.1 (Pa. Super. 1993) (reviewing an expired six- month PFA order because it fell “into the well-recognized exception to the mootness doctrine of a case which has important public policy considerations and yet may escape review.”); see also id. (observing that PFA orders “are usually temporary, and it is seldom that we have the opportunity to review one before it expires.”). 5 Appellant objected to her exclusion from the residence, pointing out that her personal belongings remained therein. 2024See Snyder v. Snyder, 629 A.2d 977 , 980 n.1 (Pa. Super. 1993) (reviewing an expired six- month PFA order because it fell “into the well-recognized exception to the mootness doctrine of a case which has important public policy considerations and yet may escape review.”); see also id. (observing that PFA orders “are usually temporary, and it is seldom that we have the opportunity to review one before it expires.”). 5 Appellant objected to her exclusion from the residence, pointing out that her personal belongings remained therein. | 3 | 6 |
In Re DAgreen1 sentence2021This appeal presents an exception to the mootness doctrine, as it involves a question “capable of repetition and apt to elude appellate review[.]” In re D.A., 801 A.2d 614, 616 (Pa. Super. 2002); see Snyder v. Snyder, 629 A.2d 977 , 980 n.1 (Pa. Super. 1993) (reviewing an expired six-month PFA order on the basis that it fell “into the well-recognized exception to the mootness doctrine of a case which has important public policy considerations and yet may escape review.”). -4- J-S03032-21 Here, the trial court entered its order pursuant to subsection 6102(a)(5) of the PFA Act, which provides th | 1 | 1 |
In Re Estate of Doronegreen2 sentences1993Sagan in Behalf of Registered Voters of Com. v. Pennsylvania Public Television Network, 518 Pa. 564 , 566 n. 2, 544 A.2d 1309 , 1310 n. 2 (1988); In re Estate of Dorone, 349 Pa.Super. 59, 65 , 502 A.2d 1271, 1274 (1985), affd 517 Pa. 3 , 534 A.2d 452 . 1993Sagan in Behalf of Registered Voters of Com. v. Pennsylvania Public Television Network, 518 Pa. 564 , 566 n. 2, 544 A.2d 1309 , 1310 n. 2 (1988); In re Estate of Dorone, 349 Pa.Super. 59, 65 , 502 A.2d 1271, 1274 (1985), affd 517 Pa. 3 , 534 A.2d 452 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Estate of Dorone
green
2 sentences1993Sagan in Behalf of Registered Voters of Com. v. Pennsylvania Public Television Network, 518 Pa. 564 , 566 n. 2, 544 A.2d 1309 , 1310 n. 2 (1988); In re Estate of Dorone, 349 Pa.Super. 59, 65 , 502 A.2d 1271, 1274 (1985), affd 517 Pa. 3 , 534 A.2d 452 . 1993Sagan in Behalf of Registered Voters of Com. v. Pennsylvania Public Television Network, 518 Pa. 564 , 566 n. 2, 544 A.2d 1309 , 1310 n. 2 (1988); In re Estate of Dorone, 349 Pa.Super. 59, 65 , 502 A.2d 1271, 1274 (1985), affd 517 Pa. 3 , 534 A.2d 452 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Sagan ex rel. Registered Voters v. Pennsylvania Public Television Network
neutral
2 sentences1993Sagan in Behalf of Registered Voters of Com. v. Pennsylvania Public Television Network, 518 Pa. 564 , 566 n. 2, 544 A.2d 1309 , 1310 n. 2 (1988); In re Estate of Dorone, 349 Pa.Super. 59, 65 , 502 A.2d 1271, 1274 (1985), affd 517 Pa. 3 , 534 A.2d 452 . 1993Sagan in Behalf of Registered Voters of Com. v. Pennsylvania Public Television Network, 518 Pa. 564 , 566 n. 2, 544 A.2d 1309 , 1310 n. 2 (1988); In re Estate of Dorone, 349 Pa.Super. 59, 65 , 502 A.2d 1271, 1274 (1985), affd 517 Pa. 3 , 534 A.2d 452 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |