conflict analysis in Pennsylvania

1975Act No, 43 is invalid if it stands “as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress.” Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52, 67 , 61 S.Ct. 399, 404 , 85 L.Ed. 581 (1941); Perez v. Campbell, 402 U.S. 637, 649 , 91 S.Ct. 1704, 1711 , 29 L.Ed.2d 233 (1971).

1975Act No, 43 is invalid if it stands “as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress.” Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52, 67 , 61 S.Ct. 399, 404 , 85 L.Ed. 581 (1941); Perez v. Campbell, 402 U.S. 637, 649 , 91 S.Ct. 1704, 1711 , 29 L.Ed.2d 233 (1971).

1975Act No, 43 is invalid if it stands “as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress.” Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52, 67 , 61 S.Ct. 399, 404 , 85 L.Ed. 581 (1941); Perez v. Campbell, 402 U.S. 637, 649 , 91 S.Ct. 1704, 1711 , 29 L.Ed.2d 233 (1971).

1975Act No, 43 is invalid if it stands “as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress.” Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52, 67 , 61 S.Ct. 399, 404 , 85 L.Ed. 581 (1941); Perez v. Campbell, 402 U.S. 637, 649 , 91 S.Ct. 1704, 1711 , 29 L.Ed.2d 233 (1971).

2024This Court held that Rivera was not entitled to relief, as he conceded “the inadequacy of his Brady claim[] and has failed to demonstrate the requisite prejudice for his ineffectiveness claim as we have repeatedly noted that Attorney Reynolds conducted an effective cross-examination of Ott[] and informed the jury of the material information necessary to impeach his testimony.” Id. at 802 . 6 To be clear, in his initial PCRA litigation, the focus of Rivera’s conflict claim was Attorney Nigrini’s relationship with Ott.

2024(See, e.g., Rivera’s Brief in Rivera II at 69 (“[A]s a result of Nigrini’s representation of Ott while Ott was cooperating with the Commonwealth, Nigrini labored under a conflict of interest that adversely affected his representation of [Rivera].”). [J-16-2024] - 10 Rivera’s final Ott-related issue concerned whether the Commonwealth knowingly presented false evidence to the jury in the form of Ott’s testimony “that he had never been promised anything in exchange for making his initial statement to prison authorities[] and that he never received any benefit from cooperating in [Rivera’s] prosec

2008After examining current public use clause jurisprudence, Justice Thomas concluded that the conflict of principle raised by the "boundless use of the eminent domain power should be resolved in petitioners' favor." Id. at 523 , 125 S.Ct. 2655 .

2008After examining current public use clause jurisprudence, Justice Thomas concluded that the conflict of principle raised by the "boundless use of the eminent domain power should be resolved in petitioners' favor." Id. at 523 , 125 S.Ct. 2655 .

1990Cf. Commonwealth v. Heckman, 366 Pa.Super. 224 , 530 A.2d 1372 (1987); Commonwealth v. Philpot, 491 Pa. 598 , 421 A.2d 1046 (1980).

1990Cf. Commonwealth v. Heckman, 366 Pa.Super. 224 , 530 A.2d 1372 (1987); Commonwealth v. Philpot, 491 Pa. 598 , 421 A.2d 1046 (1980).

1990Cf. Commonwealth v. Heckman, 366 Pa.Super. 224 , 530 A.2d 1372 (1987); Commonwealth v. Philpot, 491 Pa. 598 , 421 A.2d 1046 (1980).

1990Cf. Commonwealth v. Heckman, 366 Pa.Super. 224 , 530 A.2d 1372 (1987); Commonwealth v. Philpot, 491 Pa. 598 , 421 A.2d 1046 (1980).

1987The privilege, set forth in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, “protects an accused only from being compelled to testify against himself, or otherwise provide the state with evidence of a testimonial or communicative nature.” Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 761 , 86 S.Ct. 1826, 1830 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966).

1987The privilege, set forth in the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, “protects an accused only from being compelled to testify against himself, or otherwise provide the state with evidence of a testimonial or communicative nature.” Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 761 , 86 S.Ct. 1826, 1830 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966).