Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1981–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Foster v. Rubensteingreen1 sentence2019Id.; see also Foster v. Rubenstein, 118 A.2d 195, 196 (Pa. 1955) (concluding that execution of property based upon a judgment of confession on a bond was properly stayed where an action in equity remained pending and involved the same parties and same general subject matter). | 1 | 1 |
Quinones v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportationgreen1 sentence2019See Gale v. City of Phila., 86 A.3d 318 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2014); see also Quinones v. Dep’t of Transp., 45 A.3d 467 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2012). 13 In light of this Court’s holding, we need not address the applicability of the custodia legis doctrine. 8 IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Gerald S. Lepre, Jr. : : v. : : US Bancorp d/b/a US Bank : and Corporate Trust Services; : Gerald S. Lepre, Sr.; and Christine : Lepre-Lukus : : v. : : Pennsylvania Department of Treasury : Bureau of Unclaimed Funds : : No. 903 C.D. 2018 Appeal of: Gerald S. Lepre, Jr. : ORDER AND NOW, this 8th day of February, 2019, | 1 | 1 |
Kittrell v. Watsongreen1 sentence2019Initially, ‘[w]here a [trial court] dismisses a complaint based on preliminary objections, this Court’s review is limited to determining whether the trial court committed an error of law or an abuse of discretion.’ Kittrell v. Watson, 88 A.3d 1091, 1095 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2014). | 1 | 1 |
Gale v. City of Philadelphiagreen1 sentence2019See Gale v. City of Phila., 86 A.3d 318 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2014); see also Quinones v. Dep’t of Transp., 45 A.3d 467 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2012). 13 In light of this Court’s holding, we need not address the applicability of the custodia legis doctrine. 8 IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Gerald S. Lepre, Jr. : : v. : : US Bancorp d/b/a US Bank : and Corporate Trust Services; : Gerald S. Lepre, Sr.; and Christine : Lepre-Lukus : : v. : : Pennsylvania Department of Treasury : Bureau of Unclaimed Funds : : No. 903 C.D. 2018 Appeal of: Gerald S. Lepre, Jr. : ORDER AND NOW, this 8th day of February, 2019, | 1 | 1 |
Ramins v. Chemical Decontamination Corp.green1 sentence2018See Ramins v. Chemical Decontamination Corp., 560 A.2d 836, 840 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989). 6 IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Tiffany Bonita McCall, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1363 C.D. 2017 : Pennsylvania Treasury Department, : Bureau of Unclaimed Property, : Respondent : ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2018, the order of the Pennsylvania Treasury Department in the above-captioned matter dated October 11, 2017, is AFFIRMED. ______________________________________ MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, President Judge | 1 | 1 |
Lahr v. Faleskigreen1 sentence2004Easton cites Lahr v. Faleski, 7 Pa. D. & C.3d 315, 317-318 (1977), a case involving the sale of property pursuant to provisions of the Real Estate Tax Sale Law, 2 in which the court observed: In such a sale there is no annoyance or uncertainty arising out of disputes be *173 tween individuals to whom money is owed and those claiming a right therein by garnishment or execution. | 1 | 1 |
Keystone Savings Ass'n v. Kitsockgreen2 sentences2004See Keystone Savings Ass’n v. Kitsock, 429 Pa.Super. 561 , 633 A.2d 165 (1993); Fidelity Bank v. Carroll, 416 Pa.Super. 9 , 610 A.2d 481 (1992), aff'd, 539 Pa. 276 , 652 A.2d 296 (1994); Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A., 388 Pa.Super. 203 , 565 A.2d 448 (1989). 2004See Keystone Savings Ass’n v. Kitsock, 429 Pa.Super. 561 , 633 A.2d 165 (1993); Fidelity Bank v. Carroll, 416 Pa.Super. 9 , 610 A.2d 481 (1992), aff'd, 539 Pa. 276 , 652 A.2d 296 (1994); Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A., 388 Pa.Super. 203 , 565 A.2d 448 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
Mid-State Bank & Trust Co. v. Globalnet International, Inc.green1 sentence1999Id., at 1194-97 (Tamilia, J., dissenting) (“Because the real property in question was the subject of a specific court Order of equitable distribution and because appellant had constructive notice of that Order, I would affirm the Order of the trial court.”). | 1 | 1 |
Bulkley v. Eckertgreen1 sentence1981See Bulkley v. Eckert, 3 Pa. 368 (1846). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Easton v. Marra
green
1 sentence2019On appeal to this Court, the city argued, inter alia, that the doctrine of in custodia legis does not apply “because the reason justifying the doctrine—preventing public officials from becoming entangled in disputes over debts related to the property—does not exist in the context of a tax sale.” 862 A.2d at 172 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A.
green
2 sentences2004See Keystone Savings Ass’n v. Kitsock, 429 Pa.Super. 561 , 633 A.2d 165 (1993); Fidelity Bank v. Carroll, 416 Pa.Super. 9 , 610 A.2d 481 (1992), aff'd, 539 Pa. 276 , 652 A.2d 296 (1994); Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A., 388 Pa.Super. 203 , 565 A.2d 448 (1989). 2004See Keystone Savings Ass’n v. Kitsock, 429 Pa.Super. 561 , 633 A.2d 165 (1993); Fidelity Bank v. Carroll, 416 Pa.Super. 9 , 610 A.2d 481 (1992), aff'd, 539 Pa. 276 , 652 A.2d 296 (1994); Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A., 388 Pa.Super. 203 , 565 A.2d 448 (1989). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Fidelity Bank v. Carroll
green
2 sentences2004See Keystone Savings Ass’n v. Kitsock, 429 Pa.Super. 561 , 633 A.2d 165 (1993); Fidelity Bank v. Carroll, 416 Pa.Super. 9 , 610 A.2d 481 (1992), aff'd, 539 Pa. 276 , 652 A.2d 296 (1994); Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A., 388 Pa.Super. 203 , 565 A.2d 448 (1989). 2004See Keystone Savings Ass’n v. Kitsock, 429 Pa.Super. 561 , 633 A.2d 165 (1993); Fidelity Bank v. Carroll, 416 Pa.Super. 9 , 610 A.2d 481 (1992), aff'd, 539 Pa. 276 , 652 A.2d 296 (1994); Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A., 388 Pa.Super. 203 , 565 A.2d 448 (1989). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
FIDELITY BANK, NA v. Carroll
neutral
2 sentences2004See Keystone Savings Ass’n v. Kitsock, 429 Pa.Super. 561 , 633 A.2d 165 (1993); Fidelity Bank v. Carroll, 416 Pa.Super. 9 , 610 A.2d 481 (1992), aff'd, 539 Pa. 276 , 652 A.2d 296 (1994); Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A., 388 Pa.Super. 203 , 565 A.2d 448 (1989). 2004See Keystone Savings Ass’n v. Kitsock, 429 Pa.Super. 561 , 633 A.2d 165 (1993); Fidelity Bank v. Carroll, 416 Pa.Super. 9 , 610 A.2d 481 (1992), aff'd, 539 Pa. 276 , 652 A.2d 296 (1994); Klebach v. Mellon Bank, N.A., 388 Pa.Super. 203 , 565 A.2d 448 (1989). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. Collingdale Millwork Co.
green
2 sentences1989Department of General Service v. Collingdale Millwork Co., 71 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 286 , 291 n. 2, 454 A.2d 1176 , 1178 n. 2 (1983). 1989Department of General Service v. Collingdale Millwork Co., 71 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 286 , 291 n. 2, 454 A.2d 1176 , 1178 n. 2 (1983). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.