Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1944–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Salay v. Braungreen2 sentences2024Id. at 372 . 10 While not specifically discussed by the trial court, our courts have held that service of an individual at his or her office or usual place of business is only appropriate when the person to be served has “more proprietary responsibility and control over the business than that possessed by the average employee.” Martin v. Gerner, 481 A.2d 903, 908 (Pa.Super. 1984). - 19 - J-S47039-23 Based on our review of the record, additional venue-related discovery was required on this issue of disputed fact to allow the trial court to properly rule on Appellees’ preliminary objections as t 2024Id. at 372. 10 While not specifically discussed by the trial court, our courts have held that service of an individual at his or her office or usual place of business is only appropriate when the person to be served has “more proprietary responsibility and control over the business than that possessed by the average employee.” Martin v. Gerner, 481 A.2d 903 , 908 (Pa.Super. 1984). - 19 - J-S47039-23 Based on our review of the record, additional venue-related discovery was required on this issue of disputed fact to allow the trial court to properly rule on Appellees’ preliminary objections as t | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Gernergreen2 sentences2024Id. at 372 . 10 While not specifically discussed by the trial court, our courts have held that service of an individual at his or her office or usual place of business is only appropriate when the person to be served has “more proprietary responsibility and control over the business than that possessed by the average employee.” Martin v. Gerner, 481 A.2d 903, 908 (Pa.Super. 1984). - 19 - J-S47039-23 Based on our review of the record, additional venue-related discovery was required on this issue of disputed fact to allow the trial court to properly rule on Appellees’ preliminary objections as t 2024Id. at 372. 10 While not specifically discussed by the trial court, our courts have held that service of an individual at his or her office or usual place of business is only appropriate when the person to be served has “more proprietary responsibility and control over the business than that possessed by the average employee.” Martin v. Gerner, 481 A.2d 903 , 908 (Pa.Super. 1984). - 19 - J-S47039-23 Based on our review of the record, additional venue-related discovery was required on this issue of disputed fact to allow the trial court to properly rule on Appellees’ preliminary objections as t | 1 | 1 |
Hamre v. Resnickgreen2 sentences2024As this Court explained in Hamre v. Resnick, 337 Pa.Super. 119 , 486 A.2d 510 (1984), a trial court may appropriately resolve preliminary objections to venue (or jurisdiction) without discovery in cases where “no factual issues were raised which necessitated the reception of evidence.” Id. at 511. 2024As this Court explained in Hamre v. Resnick, 337 Pa.Super. 119 , 486 A.2d 510 (1984), a trial court may appropriately resolve preliminary objections to venue (or jurisdiction) without discovery in cases where “no factual issues were raised which necessitated the reception of evidence.” Id. at 511. | 1 | 1 |
Sutliff v. Sutliffgreen2 sentences2011Sutliff v. Sutliff, 518 Pa. 378, 385-7 , 543 A.2d 534, 538 (1988); Mackalica v. Mackalica, 716 A.2d 653, 655-6 (Pa.Super.1998). 2011Sutliff v. Sutliff, 518 Pa. 378, 385-7 , 543 A.2d 534, 538 (1988); Mackalica v. Mackalica, 716 A.2d 653, 655-6 (Pa.Super.1998). | 1 | 1 |
MacKalica v. MacKalicagreen1 sentence2011Sutliff v. Sutliff, 518 Pa. 378, 385-7 , 543 A.2d 534, 538 (1988); Mackalica v. Mackalica, 716 A.2d 653, 655-6 (Pa.Super.1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rosenberg v. Holy Redeemer Hospital
green
1 sentence2019Citing Rule 1701, the Rosenberg Court held the trial court properly could rule on the appellant’s petition to hold appellee in contempt because the court was “clearing up matters ancillary to the appeal.” Id. at 414 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Englert v. Fazio Mechanical Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence2018Englert, supra. In so doing, the court looked to the evidentiary record, in accordance with Faranashi, and determined that Appellants failed to act reasonably. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
County of Schuylkill v. Maurer
green
1 sentence1995Id. .The real properly exception and the sidewalk exception to immunity are found at 42 Pa.C.S. § 8542(b)(3) and (7), which provide: (b) Acts which may impose liability. — The following acts by a local agency or any of its employees may result in the imposition of liability on a local agency: [[Image here]] (3) Real property. — The care custody or control of real property in the possession of the local agency.... [[Image here]] (7) Sidewalks. — A dangerous condition of sidewalks within the rights-of-way of streets owned by the local agency.... . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Commonwealth v. McKinley-Gregg Automobile Co.
green
1 sentence1962Company, 345 Pa. 544 , additionally relied upon by appellants, also involved receipts from sales which formed the very business in which the taxpayer was engaged, and the Court properly applied the rule that the lack of profit did not govern taxability. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Garrett v. Jackson
green
1 sentence1944To these findings of fact the court properly applied the principle of law enunciated by Chief Justice Black in Garret v. Jackson, 20 Pa. 331 , as follows: “But where one uses an easement whenever he sees fit, without asking leave, and without objection, it is adverse, and an uninterrupted adverse enjoyment for twenty-two years is a title which cannot be afterwards disputed. | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.