Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Burtongreen2 sentences2024Id. (citations omitted). -4- J-S08040-24 In Burton, the driver was stopped for a routine traffic violation. 2018In Burton, supra, a panel of this Court concluded that a defendant, who was stopped for a routine traffic violation, “failed to demonstrate that he had a reasonably cognizable expectation of privacy in a vehicle that he did not own, that was not registered to him, and for which he ha[d] not shown authority to operate.” Id. at 436 .6 Subsequently, in Commonwealth v. Caban, 60 A.3d 120 (Pa. Super. 2012), appeal denied, 79 A.3d 1097 (Pa. 2013), another panel of this Court stated there was no “distinction between automobile drivers and passengers . . . in determining whether a reasonable _________ | 1 | 4 |
Brendlin v. Californiagreen2 sentences2010In his concurring opinion in Pratt , Judge Johnson, notes the United States Supreme Court decision in Brandiin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007), on the point that the Supreme Court of Washington does not consider a passenger to be seized when he/she is stopped as a result of a routine traffic violation. 2007See also Brendlin v. California, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 2400 , 2408 n. 5, 168 L.Ed.2d 132 (2007) (citing Mendez and acknowledging that the Supreme Court of Washington does not consider a passenger to be seized when he/she is stopped as a result of a routine traffic violation). | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Westgreen1 sentence2018See id. at 1037 . | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Powellgreen1 sentence2018See Commonwealth v. Powell, 994 A.2d 1096, 1107 (Pa. Super. 2010) (“In the present case, Powell submitted no evidence at the suppression hearing to demonstrate that he had any privacy interest in the trunk of the vehicle in which he was a passenger. ... | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Maldonado
green
1 sentence2018In Burton, supra, a panel of this Court concluded that a defendant, who was stopped for a routine traffic violation, “failed to demonstrate that he had a reasonably cognizable expectation of privacy in a vehicle that he did not own, that was not registered to him, and for which he ha[d] not shown authority to operate.” Id. at 436 .6 Subsequently, in Commonwealth v. Caban, 60 A.3d 120 (Pa. Super. 2012), appeal denied, 79 A.3d 1097 (Pa. 2013), another panel of this Court stated there was no “distinction between automobile drivers and passengers . . . in determining whether a reasonable _________ | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Commonwealth v. Caban
green
1 sentence2018In Burton, supra, a panel of this Court concluded that a defendant, who was stopped for a routine traffic violation, “failed to demonstrate that he had a reasonably cognizable expectation of privacy in a vehicle that he did not own, that was not registered to him, and for which he ha[d] not shown authority to operate.” Id. at 436 .6 Subsequently, in Commonwealth v. Caban, 60 A.3d 120 (Pa. Super. 2012), appeal denied, 79 A.3d 1097 (Pa. 2013), another panel of this Court stated there was no “distinction between automobile drivers and passengers . . . in determining whether a reasonable _________ | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Commonwealth v. Pratt
green
1 sentence2010Com. v. Pratt, 930 A.2d at 573 . . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.