Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 2004–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Probst v. Com., Dept. of Transp.green2 sentences2023Furthermore, we keep in mind that because a presumption of constitutionality attaches to any lawfully enacted legislation, the burden is upon the party attacking a statute to rebut the presumption of constitutionality by a clear, palpable, and plain demonstration that the rational basis test is not met. 849 A.2d 1135 , 1133 (Pa. 2004) (internal citations omitted). 2018If so, we must next determine whether the classification adopted in the legislation is reasonably related to accomplishing that articulated state interest or interests.” Curtis v. Kline, 666 A.2d 265, 269 (Pa. 1995). “[B]ecause a presumption of constitutionality attaches to any lawfully enacted legislation, the burden is upon the party attacking a statute to rebut the presumption of constitutionality by a clear, palpable, and plain demonstration that the rational basis test is not met.” Probst v. Dep’t of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 849 A.2d 1135, 1144 (Pa. 2004). | 3 | 6 |
Curtis v. Klinegreen1 sentence2018If so, we must next determine whether the classification adopted in the legislation is reasonably related to accomplishing that articulated state interest or interests.” Curtis v. Kline, 666 A.2d 265, 269 (Pa. 1995). “[B]ecause a presumption of constitutionality attaches to any lawfully enacted legislation, the burden is upon the party attacking a statute to rebut the presumption of constitutionality by a clear, palpable, and plain demonstration that the rational basis test is not met.” Probst v. Dep’t of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 849 A.2d 1135, 1144 (Pa. 2004). | 1 | 1 |
James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authoritygreen2 sentences2004See James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 505 Pa. 137 , 477 A.2d 1302, 1304 (1984). 2004See James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 505 Pa. 137 , 477 A.2d 1302, 1304 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.