Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Rhode Island opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Creightongreen2 sentences1997We then observed that under State v. Nordstrom, “the test to be applied is whether from the facts of a particular case the statements were spontaneous or impulsive or whether they were the product of reflection and deliberation,” In re Deborah M., 544 A.2d at 574 -75 (quoting State v. Nordstrom, 104 R.I. 471, 476 , 244 A.2d 837, 840 (R.I 1968)), and we cited Creighton for the proposition that “[generally speaking, a less demanding time requirement is necessary in sexual-offense cases, particularly when the victim is a child of tender years.” 544 A.2d at 575 (quoting Creighton, 462 A.2d at 982 1989The statements complained of were made to her foster mother within three days of being placed in foster care, a reasonable time from when she was removed from the scene of her abuse. " 'Generally speaking, a less demanding time requirement is necessary in sexual-offense cases, particularly when the victim is a child of tender years.’ ” In re Deborah M., 544 A.2d at 575 (quoting State v. Creighton, 462 A.2d at 982 )(four days between time of incident and time of statement held to be not too remote). | 1 | 5 |
State v. Jalettegreen2 sentences2006See Souza, 456 A.2d at 778 ; Jalette, 119 R.I. at 619 , 382 A.2d at 529 . 2006See Souza, 456 A.2d at 778 ; Jalette, 119 R.I. at 619 , 382 A.2d at 529 . | 1 | 2 |
State v. Souzagreen1 sentence2006See Souza, 456 A.2d at 778 ; Jalette, 119 R.I. at 619 , 382 A.2d at 529 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Nordstromgreen2 sentences1997We then observed that under State v. Nordstrom, “the test to be applied is whether from the facts of a particular case the statements were spontaneous or impulsive or whether they were the product of reflection and deliberation,” In re Deborah M., 544 A.2d at 574 -75 (quoting State v. Nordstrom, 104 R.I. 471, 476 , 244 A.2d 837, 840 (R.I 1968)), and we cited Creighton for the proposition that “[generally speaking, a less demanding time requirement is necessary in sexual-offense cases, particularly when the victim is a child of tender years.” 544 A.2d at 575 (quoting Creighton, 462 A.2d at 982 1997We then observed that under State v. Nordstrom, “the test to be applied is whether from the facts of a particular case the statements were spontaneous or impulsive or whether they were the product of reflection and deliberation,” In re Deborah M., 544 A.2d at 574 -75 (quoting State v. Nordstrom, 104 R.I. 471, 476 , 244 A.2d 837, 840 (R.I 1968)), and we cited Creighton for the proposition that “[generally speaking, a less demanding time requirement is necessary in sexual-offense cases, particularly when the victim is a child of tender years.” 544 A.2d at 575 (quoting Creighton, 462 A.2d at 982 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Deborah M.
green
2 sentences1997We then observed that under State v. Nordstrom, “the test to be applied is whether from the facts of a particular case the statements were spontaneous or impulsive or whether they were the product of reflection and deliberation,” In re Deborah M., 544 A.2d at 574 -75 (quoting State v. Nordstrom, 104 R.I. 471, 476 , 244 A.2d 837, 840 (R.I 1968)), and we cited Creighton for the proposition that “[generally speaking, a less demanding time requirement is necessary in sexual-offense cases, particularly when the victim is a child of tender years.” 544 A.2d at 575 (quoting Creighton, 462 A.2d at 982 1997We then observed that under State v. Nordstrom, “the test to be applied is whether from the facts of a particular case the statements were spontaneous or impulsive or whether they were the product of reflection and deliberation,” In re Deborah M., 544 A.2d at 574 -75 (quoting State v. Nordstrom, 104 R.I. 471, 476 , 244 A.2d 837, 840 (R.I 1968)), and we cited Creighton for the proposition that “[generally speaking, a less demanding time requirement is necessary in sexual-offense cases, particularly when the victim is a child of tender years.” 544 A.2d at 575 (quoting Creighton, 462 A.2d at 982 | 2 | 1989–1997 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.