Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hayne Federal Credit Union v. Baileygreen2 sentences2018Credit Union v. Bailey, 327 S.C. 242, 251 , 489 S.E.2d 472, 477 (1997), South Carolina formally adopted the doctrine of judicial estoppel as it relates to matters of fact. 2018Credit Union v. Bailey, 327 S.C. 242, 251 , 489 S.E.2d 472, 477 (1997), South Carolina formally adopted the doctrine of judicial estoppel as it relates to matters of fact. | 6 | 7 |
Quinn v. Sharon Corp.green2 sentences2008Credit Union v. Bailey , 327 S.C. 242, 251 , 489 S.E.2d 472, 477 (1997) (adopting the doctrine of judicial estoppel as it relates to matters of fact in South Carolina); Quinn v. The Sharon Corp. , 343 S.C. 411, 416 , 540 S.E.2d 474, 476 (Ct. App. 2000) (Anderson, J., concurring) (“A court must be able to rely on the statements made by the parties because truth is the bedrock of justice. 2008Credit Union v. Bailey , 327 S.C. 242, 251 , 489 S.E.2d 472, 477 (1997) (adopting the doctrine of judicial estoppel as it relates to matters of fact in South Carolina); Quinn v. The Sharon Corp. , 343 S.C. 411, 416 , 540 S.E.2d 474, 476 (Ct. App. 2000) (Anderson, J., concurring) (“A court must be able to rely on the statements made by the parties because truth is the bedrock of justice. | 2 | 2 |
Cothran v. Browngreen2 sentences2013See Cothran v. Brown, 357 S.C. 210, 215 , 592 S.E.2d 629, 631 (2004) (stating that South Carolina has adopted the doctrine of judicial estoppel as it relates to matters of fact, not law); Hayne Fed. 2013See Cothran v. Brown, 357 S.C. 210, 215 , 592 S.E.2d 629, 631 (2004) (stating that South Carolina has adopted the doctrine of judicial estoppel as it relates to matters of fact, not law); Hayne Fed. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||