regional standard (Tennessee) · Go Syfert
← Tennessee issues

regional standard in Tennessee

7 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2012 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Totty v. Thompsongreen
tennctapp · 2003 · cited in 5 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2005–2011
2 sentences

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Tatty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mahon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 . 12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Totty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mabon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 .12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

45
Donna Faye Shipley v. Robin Williamsgreen
tenn · 2011 · cited in 2 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012Shipley, 350 S.W.3d at 554 .

2012Id. at 553 (citations omitted).

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Mabon v. Jackson-Madison County General Hospital green
tennctapp · 1997
2 sentences

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Tatty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mahon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 . 12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Totty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mabon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 .12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

12011–2011
Wilson v. Patterson green
tennctapp · 2001
2 sentences

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Tatty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mahon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 . 12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Totty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mabon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 .12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

12011–2011
Pullum v. Robinette green
tennctapp · 2004
2 sentences

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Tatty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mahon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 . 12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Totty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mabon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 .12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

12011–2011
Kenyon v. Handal green
tennctapp · 2003
2 sentences

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Tatty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mahon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 . 12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Totty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mabon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 .12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

12011–2011
Robinson v. LeCorps green
tenn · 2002
2 sentences

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Tatty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mahon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 . 12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Totty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mabon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 .12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

12011–2011
Ayers Ex Rel. Ayers v. Rutherford Hospital, Inc. green
tennctapp · 1984
2 sentences

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Tatty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mahon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 . 12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Totty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mabon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 .12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

12011–2011
Carpenter v. Klepper green
tennctapp · 2006
2 sentences

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Tatty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mahon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 . 12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Totty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mabon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 .12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

12011–2011
Coyle v. Prieto green
tennctapp · 1991
2 sentences

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Tatty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mahon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 . 12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Totty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mabon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 .12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

12011–2011
Stovall v. Clarke green
tenn · 2003
2 sentences

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Tatty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mahon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 . 12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

2011Examples of such testimony are found in Stovall, 113 S.W.3d at 719 ; Robinson, 83 S.W.3d at 721 ; Taylor, 231 S.W.3d at 371-72 ; Carpenter, 205 S.W.3d at 479-80 ; Pullum, 174 S.W.3d at 131-32 ; Kenyon, 122 S.W.3d at 762 ; Totty, 121 S.W.3d at 678 ; Wilson, 73 S.W.3d at 99 ; Mabon, 968 S.W.2d at 828 ; Coyle, 822 S.W.2d at 598 ; and Ayers, 689 S.W.2d at 159 .12 Therefore, expert medical testimony regarding a broader regional standard or a national standard should not be barred, but should be considered as an element of the expert witness’ knowledge of the standard of care in the same or similar

12011–2011

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-115 (7)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TN 7 (2005–2012) OR 3 (1956–2023) CA 3 (1963–1966) NJ 3 (2001–2012) TX 2 (2001–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check