Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Woodhead v. Discount Waterbeds, Inc.green2 sentences2002For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [52] Woodhead at 129-30, 896 P.2d 66 (citing Anderson v. Mohundro, 24 Wash.App. 569, 575 , 604 P.2d 181 (1979), review denied, 93 Wash.2d 1013 (1980)). [53] Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance, 131 Wash.2d 484, 494 , 933 P.2d 1036 (1997) (citing Snedigar v. Hodderson, 53 Wash.App. 476, 487 , 768 P.2d 1 (1989), aff'd. in part, rev'd in part, 114 Wash.2d 153 , 786 P.2d 781 (1990)). [54] Woodhead, 78 Wash.App. at 130 , 896 P.2 2002For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her.” Woodhead, 78 Wn. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Arborwood Idaho, L.L.C. v. City of Kennewick
green
2 sentences2011Arborwood Idaho, LLC v. City of Kennewick, 151 Wash.2d 359, 367 , 89 P.3d 217 (2004). ¶ 8 CR 41(b) provides for involuntary dismissal of an action or any claim against a defendant for failure of the plaintiff to timely prosecute. 2011Arborwood Idaho, LLC v. City of Kennewick, 151 Wn.2d 359, 367 , 89 P.3d 217 (2004). ¶8 CR 41(b) provides for involuntary dismissal of an action or any claim against a defendant for failure of the plaintiff to timely prosecute. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Arborwood Idaho v. City of Kennewick
green
2 sentences2011Arborwood Idaho, LLC v. City of Kennewick, 151 Wash.2d 359, 367 , 89 P.3d 217 (2004). ¶ 8 CR 41(b) provides for involuntary dismissal of an action or any claim against a defendant for failure of the plaintiff to timely prosecute. 2011Arborwood Idaho, LLC v. City of Kennewick, 151 Wn.2d 359, 367 , 89 P.3d 217 (2004). ¶8 CR 41(b) provides for involuntary dismissal of an action or any claim against a defendant for failure of the plaintiff to timely prosecute. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Rivers v. Washington State Conference of Mason Contractors
green
2 sentences2009CR 41(b) states, “For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her.” Rivers v. Wash. State Conference of Mason Contractors, 145 Wn.2d 674, 686 , 41 P.3d 1175 (2002). 2009CR 41(b) states, "[f]or failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [26] Rivers v. Wash. State Conference of Mason Contractors, 145 Wash.2d 674, 686 , 41 P.3d 1175 (2002). [27] Id. at 687-88, 41 P.3d 1175 . [28] Id. at 696, 41 P.3d 1175 . [29] Id. at 686, 41 P.3d 1175 . [30] Rivers v. Wash. State Conference of Mason Contractors, 145 Wash.2d 674, 694 , 41 P.3d 1175 (2002). [31] Rogers Potato Serv., LLC v. Countrywide Potato, LLC, 152 Wash.2d 387, 391 , 97 P.3d 745 | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Rivers v. STATE CONF. OF MASON CONTRACTORS
green
2 sentences2009CR 41(b) states, “For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her.” Rivers v. Wash. State Conference of Mason Contractors, 145 Wn.2d 674, 686 , 41 P.3d 1175 (2002). 2009CR 41(b) states, "[f]or failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [26] Rivers v. Wash. State Conference of Mason Contractors, 145 Wash.2d 674, 686 , 41 P.3d 1175 (2002). [27] Id. at 687-88, 41 P.3d 1175 . [28] Id. at 696, 41 P.3d 1175 . [29] Id. at 686, 41 P.3d 1175 . [30] Rivers v. Wash. State Conference of Mason Contractors, 145 Wash.2d 674, 694 , 41 P.3d 1175 (2002). [31] Rogers Potato Serv., LLC v. Countrywide Potato, LLC, 152 Wash.2d 387, 391 , 97 P.3d 745 | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Anderson v. Mohundro
green
2 sentences2002For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [52] Woodhead at 129-30, 896 P.2d 66 (citing Anderson v. Mohundro, 24 Wash.App. 569, 575 , 604 P.2d 181 (1979), review denied, 93 Wash.2d 1013 (1980)). [53] Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance, 131 Wash.2d 484, 494 , 933 P.2d 1036 (1997) (citing Snedigar v. Hodderson, 53 Wash.App. 476, 487 , 768 P.2d 1 (1989), aff'd. in part, rev'd in part, 114 Wash.2d 153 , 786 P.2d 781 (1990)). [54] Woodhead, 78 Wash.App. at 130 , 896 P.2 2002For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [52] Woodhead at 129-30, 896 P.2d 66 (citing Anderson v. Mohundro, 24 Wash.App. 569, 575 , 604 P.2d 181 (1979), review denied, 93 Wash.2d 1013 (1980)). [53] Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance, 131 Wash.2d 484, 494 , 933 P.2d 1036 (1997) (citing Snedigar v. Hodderson, 53 Wash.App. 476, 487 , 768 P.2d 1 (1989), aff'd. in part, rev'd in part, 114 Wash.2d 153 , 786 P.2d 781 (1990)). [54] Woodhead, 78 Wash.App. at 130 , 896 P.2 | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Walker v. BONNEY-WATSON COMPANY
green
1 sentence2023“A trial court may exercise its discretion to dismiss an action based on a party’s willful noncompliance with a reasonable court order.” Walker v. Bonney-Watson Co., 64 Wn. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Bosley
green
1 sentence2023Cowiche Canyon, 118 Wn.2d at 809 . -24- No. 82407-4-I/25 19.16.110; per se CPA claims based on the remaining FDCPA claims; and section G of Steichen’s claim for a declaratory judgment. 11 When Steichen failed to participate in the trial, the trial court dismissed the remaining claims. 12 Under CR 41(b), for failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move to dismiss an action or any claim against him. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Hanson v. Shim
green
2 sentences2009The statute of limitations for Jones Act personal injury claims is three years. 46 U.S.C. § 30106 . [33] Hanson v. Shim, 87 Wash.App. 538, 551 , 943 P.2d 322 (1997) (alteration in original), review denied, 134 Wash.2d 1017 , 958 P.2d 313 (1998). 2009The statute of limitations for Jones Act personal injury claims is three years. 46 U.S.C. § 30106 . [33] Hanson v. Shim, 87 Wash.App. 538, 551 , 943 P.2d 322 (1997) (alteration in original), review denied, 134 Wash.2d 1017 , 958 P.2d 313 (1998). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
ROGERS POTATO SERVICE v. Countrywide Potato
green
1 sentence2009CR 41(b) states, "[f]or failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [26] Rivers v. Wash. State Conference of Mason Contractors, 145 Wash.2d 674, 686 , 41 P.3d 1175 (2002). [27] Id. at 687-88, 41 P.3d 1175 . [28] Id. at 696, 41 P.3d 1175 . [29] Id. at 686, 41 P.3d 1175 . [30] Rivers v. Wash. State Conference of Mason Contractors, 145 Wash.2d 674, 694 , 41 P.3d 1175 (2002). [31] Rogers Potato Serv., LLC v. Countrywide Potato, LLC, 152 Wash.2d 387, 391 , 97 P.3d 745 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Rogers Potato Service, L.L.C. v. Countrywide Potato, L.L.C.
green
1 sentence2009CR 41(b) states, "[f]or failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [26] Rivers v. Wash. State Conference of Mason Contractors, 145 Wash.2d 674, 686 , 41 P.3d 1175 (2002). [27] Id. at 687-88, 41 P.3d 1175 . [28] Id. at 696, 41 P.3d 1175 . [29] Id. at 686, 41 P.3d 1175 . [30] Rivers v. Wash. State Conference of Mason Contractors, 145 Wash.2d 674, 694 , 41 P.3d 1175 (2002). [31] Rogers Potato Serv., LLC v. Countrywide Potato, LLC, 152 Wash.2d 387, 391 , 97 P.3d 745 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Dowell Co. v. Gagnon
green
1 sentence2009CR 41(b) states, "[f]or failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [26] Rivers v. Wash. State Conference of Mason Contractors, 145 Wash.2d 674, 686 , 41 P.3d 1175 (2002). [27] Id. at 687-88, 41 P.3d 1175 . [28] Id. at 696, 41 P.3d 1175 . [29] Id. at 686, 41 P.3d 1175 . [30] Rivers v. Wash. State Conference of Mason Contractors, 145 Wash.2d 674, 694 , 41 P.3d 1175 (2002). [31] Rogers Potato Serv., LLC v. Countrywide Potato, LLC, 152 Wash.2d 387, 391 , 97 P.3d 745 | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance
green
1 sentence2002For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [52] Woodhead at 129-30, 896 P.2d 66 (citing Anderson v. Mohundro, 24 Wash.App. 569, 575 , 604 P.2d 181 (1979), review denied, 93 Wash.2d 1013 (1980)). [53] Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance, 131 Wash.2d 484, 494 , 933 P.2d 1036 (1997) (citing Snedigar v. Hodderson, 53 Wash.App. 476, 487 , 768 P.2d 1 (1989), aff'd. in part, rev'd in part, 114 Wash.2d 153 , 786 P.2d 781 (1990)). [54] Woodhead, 78 Wash.App. at 130 , 896 P.2 | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Snedigar v. Hodderson
green
2 sentences2002For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [52] Woodhead at 129-30, 896 P.2d 66 (citing Anderson v. Mohundro, 24 Wash.App. 569, 575 , 604 P.2d 181 (1979), review denied, 93 Wash.2d 1013 (1980)). [53] Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance, 131 Wash.2d 484, 494 , 933 P.2d 1036 (1997) (citing Snedigar v. Hodderson, 53 Wash.App. 476, 487 , 768 P.2d 1 (1989), aff'd. in part, rev'd in part, 114 Wash.2d 153 , 786 P.2d 781 (1990)). [54] Woodhead, 78 Wash.App. at 130 , 896 P.2 2002For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [52] Woodhead at 129-30, 896 P.2d 66 (citing Anderson v. Mohundro, 24 Wash.App. 569, 575 , 604 P.2d 181 (1979), review denied, 93 Wash.2d 1013 (1980)). [53] Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance, 131 Wash.2d 484, 494 , 933 P.2d 1036 (1997) (citing Snedigar v. Hodderson, 53 Wash.App. 476, 487 , 768 P.2d 1 (1989), aff'd. in part, rev'd in part, 114 Wash.2d 153 , 786 P.2d 781 (1990)). [54] Woodhead, 78 Wash.App. at 130 , 896 P.2 | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance
green
1 sentence2002For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [52] Woodhead at 129-30, 896 P.2d 66 (citing Anderson v. Mohundro, 24 Wash.App. 569, 575 , 604 P.2d 181 (1979), review denied, 93 Wash.2d 1013 (1980)). [53] Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance, 131 Wash.2d 484, 494 , 933 P.2d 1036 (1997) (citing Snedigar v. Hodderson, 53 Wash.App. 476, 487 , 768 P.2d 1 (1989), aff'd. in part, rev'd in part, 114 Wash.2d 153 , 786 P.2d 781 (1990)). [54] Woodhead, 78 Wash.App. at 130 , 896 P.2 | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Snedigar v. Hoddersen
green
2 sentences2002For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [52] Woodhead at 129-30, 896 P.2d 66 (citing Anderson v. Mohundro, 24 Wash.App. 569, 575 , 604 P.2d 181 (1979), review denied, 93 Wash.2d 1013 (1980)). [53] Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance, 131 Wash.2d 484, 494 , 933 P.2d 1036 (1997) (citing Snedigar v. Hodderson, 53 Wash.App. 476, 487 , 768 P.2d 1 (1989), aff'd. in part, rev'd in part, 114 Wash.2d 153 , 786 P.2d 781 (1990)). [54] Woodhead, 78 Wash.App. at 130 , 896 P.2 2002For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action or any claim against him or her." [52] Woodhead at 129-30, 896 P.2d 66 (citing Anderson v. Mohundro, 24 Wash.App. 569, 575 , 604 P.2d 181 (1979), review denied, 93 Wash.2d 1013 (1980)). [53] Burnet v. Spokane Ambulance, 131 Wash.2d 484, 494 , 933 P.2d 1036 (1997) (citing Snedigar v. Hodderson, 53 Wash.App. 476, 487 , 768 P.2d 1 (1989), aff'd. in part, rev'd in part, 114 Wash.2d 153 , 786 P.2d 781 (1990)). [54] Woodhead, 78 Wash.App. at 130 , 896 P.2 | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.