Boeing defense in Washington

7 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
In Re the Guardianship of Adamecgreen wash · 1983 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989 2 sentences 1989In order to justify relief from judgment pursuant to CR 60(b)(1), the moving party must demonstrate, among other possible reasons, "irregularity in obtaining a judgment or order . . ." 2 Irregularities within the meaning of CR 60(b)(1) "are those relating to want of adherence to some prescribed rule or mode of proceeding." In re Adamec, 100 Wn.2d 166, 174, 667 P.2d 1085 (1983). 1989In order to justify relief from judgment pursuant to CR 60(b)(1), the moving party must demonstrate, among other possible reasons, "irregularity in obtaining a judgment or order . . ." 2 Irregularities within the meaning of CR 60(b)(1) "are those relating to want of adherence to some prescribed rule or mode of proceeding." In re Adamec, 100 Wn.2d 166, 174, 667 P.2d 1085 (1983).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

Case	Cited	Years
Ellison v. Process Systems Inc. Construction Co. green washctapp · 2002 2 sentences 2003Ellison, 112 Wn. 2003Ellison, 112 Wash.App. at 644 , 50 P.3d 658 . [37] Although Lloyd's asserts that fees were also improperly awarded under the CPA, it does not provide any argument or authority to support its assertion.	2	2003–2003
McClelland v. ITT Rayonier, Inc. green washctapp · 1992 1 sentence 2020We review evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion.8 A trial court abuses its discretion when it makes a manifestly unreasonable decision or bases its 5 Ruse, 138 Wn. 2d at 5 -6 (quoting McClelland v. ITT Rayonier, Inc., 65 Wn.	1	2020–2020
Ruse v. Department of Labor & Industries green wash · 1999 1 sentence 2020We review evidentiary rulings for abuse of discretion.8 A trial court abuses its discretion when it makes a manifestly unreasonable decision or bases its 5 Ruse, 138 Wn. 2d at 5 -6 (quoting McClelland v. ITT Rayonier, Inc., 65 Wn.	1	2020–2020
Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert green scotus · 1980 1 sentence 2020Id. at 482 .	1	2020–2020
Ellison v. Process Systems Inc. Const. Co. green washctapp · 2002 1 sentence 2003Ellison, 112 Wash.App. at 644 , 50 P.3d 658 . [37] Although Lloyd's asserts that fees were also improperly awarded under the CPA, it does not provide any argument or authority to support its assertion.	1	2003–2003
Gugin v. Sonico, Inc. green washctapp · 1993 1 sentence 1994That argument must fail in light of Gugin v. Sonico, Inc., 68 Wn.	1	1994–1994
Thompson v. St. Regis Paper Company green wash · 1984 2 sentences 1994Regis Paper Co., 102 Wn.2d 219 , 685 P.2d 1081 (1984). 1994Regis Paper Co., 102 Wn.2d 219 , 685 P.2d 1081 (1984).	1	1994–1994
Gage v. Boeing Company green washctapp · 1989 1 sentence 1992The trial court granted Boeing's motion to vacate the judgments, and Gage appealed to the Court of Appeals. 55 Wn.	1	1992–1992

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 4.28.210 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WA 7 (1989–2020) AL 3 (1987–2004) IL 3 (2008–2023) LA 2 (1966–1991)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check

Your account

Appearance