Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
cluster 412099green1 sentence1994It is clear that this annexation, if approved, would cause a substantial impairment of the bond contracts. *156 Having found an impairment, the next question is whether the challenged legislation is "nevertheless justified as a reasonable and necessary exercise of the State’s sovereign power.” Continental, 696 F.2d at 697. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tyrpak v. Daniels
green
2 sentences2006The court explained that "[t]he bondholders bought the bonds with the presumption that the Port of Vancouver would continue to exist in the form that was described at the time of the bonds issue" and if a "change were made, their security would be protected." Id. 2006The court explained that “[t]he bondholders bought the bonds with the presumption that the Port of Vancouver would continue to exist in the form that was described at the time of the bonds issue” and if a “change were made, their security would be protected.” Id. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
In Re Davison
green
2 sentences1986Rainier concedes the trial court's entry of judgment beyond the $30,000 value of the bonds was error under In re Davison, 31 Wn. 1986Rainier concedes the trial court's entry of judgment beyond the $30,000 value *802 of the bonds was error under In re Davision, 31 Wn. | 2 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Alvarado
green
1 sentence2024State v. Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d 556, 569 , 192 P.3d 345 (2008) (the court “cannot review” claims that rely on evidence outside the appellate record).1 Thus, this claim fails. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Alvarado
green
1 sentence2024State v. Alvarado, 164 Wn.2d 556, 569 , 192 P.3d 345 (2008) (the court “cannot review” claims that rely on evidence outside the appellate record).1 Thus, this claim fails. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
United States v. Hensley
green
2 sentences2013Bonds's claim fails. 3 Bonds also cites United States v. Hensley, 469 U. . 221, 229, 105 S. Ct. 675 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 604 S 1985), the proposition that an investigative detention " o investigate a past crime, as for t distinguished from present or suspected future criminal activity, can only be made based on a reasonable suspicion, grounded in specific and articulable facts, that a person they encounter is wanted in connection with a completed felony." of Appellant at 14 (boldface omitted) Br. emphasis added).Bonds's citation is not well taken. 2013Bonds's claim fails. 3 Bonds also cites United States v. Hensley, 469 U. . 221, 229, 105 S. Ct. 675 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 604 S 1985), the proposition that an investigative detention " o investigate a past crime, as for t distinguished from present or suspected future criminal activity, can only be made based on a reasonable suspicion, grounded in specific and articulable facts, that a person they encounter is wanted in connection with a completed felony." of Appellant at 14 (boldface omitted) Br. emphasis added).Bonds's citation is not well taken. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.