7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Vance v. City of Seattlegreen2 sentences2000See Pierce, 62 Wash.2d at 332 , 382 P.2d 628 ; see also Vance, 18 Wash.App. at 425 , 569 P.2d 1194 (noting that laches is an equitable doctrine and its application does not depend solely upon the passage of time alone, but also upon the effects of delay upon the relative positions of the parties) (quoting Holmberg *1167 v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392 , 66 S.Ct. 582 , 90 L.Ed. 743 , 162 A.L.R. 719 (1946)). 2000See Pierce, 62 Wash.2d at 332 , 382 P.2d 628 ; see also Vance, 18 Wash.App. at 425 , 569 P.2d 1194 (noting that laches is an equitable doctrine and its application does not depend solely upon the passage of time alone, but also upon the effects of delay upon the relative positions of the parties) (quoting Holmberg *1167 v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392 , 66 S.Ct. 582 , 90 L.Ed. 743 , 162 A.L.R. 719 (1946)). | 2 | 2 |
Pierce v. King Countygreen2 sentences2000See Pierce, 62 Wash.2d at 332 , 382 P.2d 628 ; see also Vance, 18 Wash.App. at 425 , 569 P.2d 1194 (noting that laches is an equitable doctrine and its application does not depend solely upon the passage of time alone, but also upon the effects of delay upon the relative positions of the parties) (quoting Holmberg *1167 v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392 , 66 S.Ct. 582 , 90 L.Ed. 743 , 162 A.L.R. 719 (1946)). 2000See Pierce, 62 Wash.2d at 332 , 382 P.2d 628 ; see also Vance, 18 Wash.App. at 425 , 569 P.2d 1194 (noting that laches is an equitable doctrine and its application does not depend solely upon the passage of time alone, but also upon the effects of delay upon the relative positions of the parties) (quoting Holmberg *1167 v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392 , 66 S.Ct. 582 , 90 L.Ed. 743 , 162 A.L.R. 719 (1946)). | 2 | 2 |
Holmberg v. Armbrechtgreen2 sentences2000See Pierce, 62 Wash.2d at 332 , 382 P.2d 628 ; see also Vance, 18 Wash.App. at 425 , 569 P.2d 1194 (noting that laches is an equitable doctrine and its application does not depend solely upon the passage of time alone, but also upon the effects of delay upon the relative positions of the parties) (quoting Holmberg *1167 v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392 , 66 S.Ct. 582 , 90 L.Ed. 743 , 162 A.L.R. 719 (1946)). 2000See Pierce, 62 Wash.2d at 332 , 382 P.2d 628 ; see also Vance, 18 Wash.App. at 425 , 569 P.2d 1194 (noting that laches is an equitable doctrine and its application does not depend solely upon the passage of time alone, but also upon the effects of delay upon the relative positions of the parties) (quoting Holmberg *1167 v. Armbrecht, 327 U.S. 392 , 66 S.Ct. 582 , 90 L.Ed. 743 , 162 A.L.R. 719 (1946)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Detention of LaBelle
green
2 sentences2021A key component in this analysis is whether the respondent is able to “form realistic plans for taking care of himself outside the hospital setting.” LaBelle, 107 Wn.2d at 210 . 2021A key component in this analysis is whether the respondent is able to “form realistic plans for taking care of himself outside the hospital setting.” LaBelle, 107 Wn.2d at 210 . | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Reese v. Stroh
green
2 sentences2009“Appraisal Consulting” is “the act or process of developing an analysis, recommendation, or opinion to solve a problem, where an opinion of value is a component of the analysis leading to the assignment results.” Id. 2009"Appraisal Consulting" is "the act or process of developing an analysis, recommendation, or opinion to solve a problem, where an opinion of value is a component of the analysis leading to the assignment results." Id. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
In re the Detention of M.K.
green
1 sentence2021AP argues that there had to be evidence that he was unable to provide for his essential needs or make rational decisions regarding his care and that it was mere speculation that he would stop taking his medication and decompensate if he were to be released from the LRA order.7 But Osborne testified that AP wanted to stop taking his medication and that if AP were not subject to 7 AP also argues that, as in In re Detention of M.K., 168 Wn. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Avellaneda v. State
green
1 sentence2017But, discretionary immunity turns on 5 Avellaneda, 167 Wn. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.