22 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Delaneygreen2 sentences2018App. 2009) (discussing the state of the law with respect to the validity of waivers of appeal prior to Broadway , and observing that a defendant's waiver of appeal will be "knowing" only when he is "in a position to know the nature of the claims he could have brought on appeal but for his waiver"). 5 See Broadway , 301 S.W.3d at 697 ("A key component to our analysis in Delaney was that the waiver of appeal was not the result of a bargain."); Delaney , 207 S.W.3d at 798 ("When a presentencing waiver of appeal was not bargained for in exchange for an agreed upon sentence, concerns as to the vali 2018App. 2009) (discussing the state of the law with respect to the validity of waivers of appeal prior to Broadway, and observing that a defendant’s waiver of appeal will be “knowing” only when he is “in a position to know the nature of the claims he could have brought on appeal but for his waiver”). 5 See Broadway, 301 S.W.3d at 697 (“A key component to our analysis in Delaney was that the waiver of appeal was not the result of a bargain.”); Delaney, 207 S.W.3d at 798 (“When a presentencing waiver of appeal was not bargained for in exchange for an agreed upon sentence, concerns as to the validit | 2 | 5 |
Oliver v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2025When determining whether an area is an open field or curtilage, the Supreme Court has stated, “the central component of this inquiry [is] whether the area harbors the intimate activity associated with the ‘sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of life.’” United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294, 300 (1987) (some internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Oliver, 466 U.S. at 180 ). 2015The central component of this inquiry is “whether the area harbors the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of life.” See Oliver v. U.S., 466 U.S. 170, 180 (1984); Dunn, 480 U.S. at 300 . | 2 | 3 |
Jones, Andrew Oleviagreen2 sentences2018App. 2009) (discussing the state of the law with respect to the validity of waivers of appeal prior to Broadway, and observing that a defendant’s waiver of appeal will be “knowing” only when he is “in a position to know the nature of the claims he could have brought on appeal but for his waiver”). 5 See Broadway, 301 S.W.3d at 697 (“A key component to our analysis in Delaney was that the waiver of appeal was not the result of a bargain.”); Delaney, 207 S.W.3d at 798 (“When a presentencing waiver of appeal was not bargained for in exchange for an agreed upon sentence, concerns as to the validit 2018App. 2009) (discussing the state of the law with respect to the validity of waivers of appeal prior to Broadway , and observing that a defendant's waiver of appeal will be "knowing" only when he is "in a position to know the nature of the claims he could have brought on appeal but for his waiver"). 5 See Broadway , 301 S.W.3d at 697 ("A key component to our analysis in Delaney was that the waiver of appeal was not the result of a bargain."); Delaney , 207 S.W.3d at 798 ("When a presentencing waiver of appeal was not bargained for in exchange for an agreed upon sentence, concerns as to the vali | 2 | 2 |
Ex Parte Broadwaygreen2 sentences2018App. 2009) (discussing the state of the law with respect to the validity of waivers of appeal prior to Broadway , and observing that a defendant's waiver of appeal will be "knowing" only when he is "in a position to know the nature of the claims he could have brought on appeal but for his waiver"). 5 See Broadway , 301 S.W.3d at 697 ("A key component to our analysis in Delaney was that the waiver of appeal was not the result of a bargain."); Delaney , 207 S.W.3d at 798 ("When a presentencing waiver of appeal was not bargained for in exchange for an agreed upon sentence, concerns as to the vali 2018App. 2009) (discussing the state of the law with respect to the validity of waivers of appeal prior to Broadway, and observing that a defendant’s waiver of appeal will be “knowing” only when he is “in a position to know the nature of the claims he could have brought on appeal but for his waiver”). 5 See Broadway, 301 S.W.3d at 697 (“A key component to our analysis in Delaney was that the waiver of appeal was not the result of a bargain.”); Delaney, 207 S.W.3d at 798 (“When a presentencing waiver of appeal was not bargained for in exchange for an agreed upon sentence, concerns as to the validit | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Dunngreen2 sentences2025When determining whether an area is an open field or curtilage, the Supreme Court has stated, “the central component of this inquiry [is] whether the area harbors the intimate activity associated with the ‘sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of life.’” United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294, 300 (1987) (some internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Oliver, 466 U.S. at 180 ). 2015The central component of this inquiry is “whether the area harbors the intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man’s home and the privacies of life.” See Oliver v. U.S., 466 U.S. 170, 180 (1984); Dunn, 480 U.S. at 300 . | 1 | 4 |
Palmberg, Bryan Elliottgreen2 sentences2018App. 2016) ("[W]e conclude that the documents in the record here are adequate to show that appellant's waiver of his right of appeal was a part of his plea agreement and that he received consideration for it."). 6 See SPA's Brief on the Merits at 15 (arguing that the Court has "shift[ed] its focus from what the defendant was told to what he knew he did not know[,]" citing Ex parte Palmberg , 491 S.W.3d 804 , 809 (Tex. Crim. 2018App. 2016) (“[W]e conclude that the documents in the record here are adequate to show that appellant’s waiver of his right of appeal was a part of his plea agreement and that he received consideration for it.”). 6 See SPA’s Brief on the Merits at 15 (arguing that the Court has “shift[ed] its focus from what the defendant was told to what he knew he did not know[,]” citing Ex parte Palmberg, 491 S.W.3d 804, 809 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2 |
Ingram v. Deeregreen1 sentence2022A key component of this inquiry is whether the evidence is developed under circumstances indicating that both parties “understood what the issue was in the case, and the other party failed to make an appropriate complaint.” In re K.S., 448 S.W.3d at 533 ; see Ingram, 288 S.W.3d at 893 . | 1 | 1 |
Evanston Insurance Co. v. Legacy of Life, Inc.green1 sentence2016In Evanston Insurance Co. v. Legacy of Life, Inc., the Texas Supreme-Court recently addressed a claim brought by a surviving daughter against an organ donation charity regarding questions pertaining to insurance coverage. 370 S.W.3d 377, 379 (Tex.2012). | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Evansgreen1 sentence2016See id. (citing Young, 644 S.W.2d at 4 ). | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Younggreen1 sentence2016See id. (citing Young, 644 S.W.2d at 4 ). | 1 | 1 |
McCarty v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See McCarty v. State, 498 S.W.2d 212, 216 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Ernest Leyba v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Leyba v. State, 416 S.W. 3d 563, 574 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, pet. ref’d)(holding that the improper admission of a defendant’s prior aggravated robbery conviction was harmless in part because the court could not determine that the prosecutor elicited the inadmissible evidence for an inflammatory purpose.) Given the strength of the State’s case against Appellant, and the relatively inoffensive nature of Appellant’s prior felony, it is implausible that a handful of brief references to that prior conviction could have caused Brief of Appellee Victoria County Criminal District Att | 1 | 1 |
Evans v. Stategreen1 sentence2012McKithan v. State, 324 S.W.3d 582, 588 (Tex.Crim.App.2010) (citing Evans v. State, 299 S.W.3d 138, 143 (Tex.Crim.App.2009)). | 1 | 1 |
McKithan v. Stategreen1 sentence2012McKithan v. State, 324 S.W.3d 582, 588 (Tex.Crim.App.2010) (citing Evans v. State, 299 S.W.3d 138, 143 (Tex.Crim.App.2009)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hall v. State
green
2 sentences2009Hall, 225 S.W.3d at 535 . 2009Hall , 225 S.W.3d at 535 . | 5 | 2009–2009 |
In the Interest of K.S., a Child
green
1 sentence2022A key component of this inquiry is whether the evidence is developed under circumstances indicating that both parties “understood what the issue was in the case, and the other party failed to make an appropriate complaint.” In re K.S., 448 S.W.3d at 533 ; see Ingram, 288 S.W.3d at 893 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Deal v. State Farm County Mut. Ins. Co. of Texas
green
1 sentence1997Deal, 5 F.3d at 119 ; Fields, 906 F.2d at 1020 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Allene Fields and Earine Daniels v. Hallsville Independent School District
green
1 sentence1997Deal, 5 F.3d at 119 ; Fields, 906 F.2d at 1020 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.
green
1 sentence1993APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL FILED JUNE 8 The motion alleged Old Republic had “satisfied its burden of establishing it met the requirements set forth in Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, [ 134 Tex. 388 ] 133 S.W.2d 120 [124], 126 (Tex.1939),” along with other pleadings. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.