7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Harrisongreen2 sentences2010See State v. Harrison, 148 Wn.2d 550, 554 , 61 P.3d 1104 (2003) (the specific performance remedy entitles the defendant to a reversal of the original sentence and a de novo sentencing hearing in which the State abides by the plea agreement and the court is free to exercise its discretion). ¶16 The DOC next contends specific performance of the unlawful plea agreement violates the separation of powers doctrine. 2010See State v. Harrison, 148 Wash.2d 550, 554 , 61 P.3d 1104 (2003) (the specific performance remedy entitles the defendant to a reversal of the original sentence and a de novo sentencing hearing in which the State abides by the plea agreement and the court is free to exercise its discretion). ¶ 16 The DOC next contends specific performance of the unlawful plea agreement violates the separation of powers doctrine. | 2 | 4 |
State v. Harrisongreen2 sentences2010See State v. Harrison, 148 Wn.2d 550, 554 , 61 P.3d 1104 (2003) (the specific performance remedy entitles the defendant to a reversal of the original sentence and a de novo sentencing hearing in which the State abides by the plea agreement and the court is free to exercise its discretion). ¶16 The DOC next contends specific performance of the unlawful plea agreement violates the separation of powers doctrine. 2010See State v. Harrison, 148 Wash.2d 550, 554 , 61 P.3d 1104 (2003) (the specific performance remedy entitles the defendant to a reversal of the original sentence and a de novo sentencing hearing in which the State abides by the plea agreement and the court is free to exercise its discretion). ¶ 16 The DOC next contends specific performance of the unlawful plea agreement violates the separation of powers doctrine. | 2 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. James
green
2 sentences2003James, 35 Wash.App. at 355 , 666 P.2d 943 . 2003James, 35 Wn. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
State of Washington v. Daniel Herbert Dunbar
green
1 sentence2024App. 2d 238 , 532 P.3d 652 (2023). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.