Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Personal Restraint of Rice
green
2 sentences2001To support a request for a reference hearing, “the petitioner must state with particularity facts which, if proven, would entitle him to relief.” In re Personal Restraint of Rice, 118 Wn.2d 876, 886 , 828 P.2d 1086 (1992). 2001To support a request for a reference hearing, “the petitioner must state with particularity facts which, if proven, would entitle him to relief.” In re Personal Restraint of Rice, 118 Wn.2d 876, 886 , 828 P.2d 1086 (1992). | 3 | 2001–2020 |
Remmer v. United States
green
2 sentences2005Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227, 229 , 74 S. Ct. 450 , 98 L. 2005Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227, 229 , 74 S. Ct. 450 , 98 L. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
In Re Reise
green
1 sentence2020App. 772, 789 , 192 P.3d 949 (2008).Where a petitioner relies on the knowledge of others to support a request for a reference hearing, the petitioner must present a declaration or other corroborative evidence, rather than merely speculating about what that person might say. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Ruiz-Sanabria
green
1 sentence2017Review denied at 189 Wn.2d 1024 (2017). 1 The 2014 amendments to the rule struck a former subsection (ii) and renumbered former subsection (iii), but did not alter the language at issue in subsection (i) that was at issue in the cases discussed herein. 2 Ruiz-Sanabria is a per curiam decision issued without argument. 184 Wn.2d at 635 . 3 Nothing in this opinion should be read as expressing any view on the merits of the request for a reference hearing. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Kell
neutral
1 sentence2005Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227, 229 , 74 S.Ct. 450 , 98 L.Ed. 654 (1954); State v. Kell, 101 Wash.App. 619, 621 , 5 P.3d 47 (2000). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Kell
green
1 sentence2005Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227, 229 , 74 S.Ct. 450 , 98 L.Ed. 654 (1954); State v. Kell, 101 Wash.App. 619, 621 , 5 P.3d 47 (2000). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Kuhlmann v. Wilson
green
1 sentence1992Ed. 2d 364 , 106 S. Ct. 2616 (1986)). 1 Finally, we take this opportunity to explain more fully the showing petitioners must make to support a request for a reference hearing. | 1 | 1992–1992 |