right to mount defense (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

right to mount defense in Washington

7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
United States v. Robert Jean Theresius Filippigreen
ca1 · 1990 · cited in 4 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2011–2024
2 sentences

2024App. 781, 787 , 251 P.3d 264 (2011) (quoting United States v. Theresius Filippi, 918 F.2d 244, 247 (1st Cir. 1990)).

2017App. 781, 787 , 251 P.3d 264 (2011)(quoting United States v. Theresius Filippi, 918 F.2d 244, 247 (1st Cir. 1990)).

34

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
State v. McCabe neutral
washctapp · 2011
2 sentences

2025App. 781, 787 , 251 P.3d 264 (2011).

2024App. 781, 787 , 251 P.3d 264 (2011) (quoting United States v. Theresius Filippi, 918 F.2d 244, 247 (1st Cir. 1990)).

32017–2025
State v. McCabe neutral
washctapp · 2011
2 sentences

2025In order for the right to compulsory process to be violated, the State’s conduct must “impermissibly interfere with the right to mount a defense.” State v. McCabe, 161 Wn.

2024App. 342, 351 , 908 P.2d 892 (1996) (citing State v. Smith, 101 Wn.2d 36, 41 , 677 P.2d 100 (1984)). 38 No. 38909-0-III State v. Leavens “In order for the right to be violated, the ‘sovereign’s conduct’ must impermissibly interfere with the right to mount a defense.” State v. McCabe, 161 Wn.

32017–2025
United States v. Barry Hoffman green
ca1 · 1987
2 sentences

2011United States v. Theresius Filippi, 918 F.2d 244, 247 (1st Cir. 1990) (quoting United States v. Hoffman, 832 F.2d 1299 , 1303 n.3 (1st Cir. 1987)).

2011United States v. Theresius Filippi, 918 F.2d 244, 247 (1st Cir.1990) (quoting United States v. Hoffman, 832 F.2d 1299 , 1303 n. 3 (1st Cir.1987)).

22011–2011
Chambers v. Mississippi green
scotus · 1973
2 sentences

1999“Few rights are more fundamental than that of an accused to present witnesses in his own defense.” Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 302 , 93 S. Ct. 1038 , 35 L.

1999“Few rights are more fundamental than that of an accused to present witnesses in his own defense.” Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 302 , 93 S. Ct. 1038 , 35 L.

21999–1999
State v. Roberts green
washctapp · 1996
1 sentence

2024App. 342, 351 , 908 P.2d 892 (1996) (citing State v. Smith, 101 Wn.2d 36, 41 , 677 P.2d 100 (1984)). 38 No. 38909-0-III State v. Leavens “In order for the right to be violated, the ‘sovereign’s conduct’ must impermissibly interfere with the right to mount a defense.” State v. McCabe, 161 Wn.

12024–2024
State v. Smith green
wash · 1984
2 sentences

2024App. 342, 351 , 908 P.2d 892 (1996) (citing State v. Smith, 101 Wn.2d 36, 41 , 677 P.2d 100 (1984)). 38 No. 38909-0-III State v. Leavens “In order for the right to be violated, the ‘sovereign’s conduct’ must impermissibly interfere with the right to mount a defense.” State v. McCabe, 161 Wn.

2024App. 342, 351 , 908 P.2d 892 (1996) (citing State v. Smith, 101 Wn.2d 36, 41 , 677 P.2d 100 (1984)). 38 No. 38909-0-III State v. Leavens “In order for the right to be violated, the ‘sovereign’s conduct’ must impermissibly interfere with the right to mount a defense.” State v. McCabe, 161 Wn.

12024–2024

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WA 7 (1999–2025) TN 2 (2013–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check