Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Waller v. Georgiagreen2 sentences2018See, e.g., Waller v. Georgia , 467 U.S. 39 , 104 S.Ct. 2210 , 81 L.Ed. 2d 31 (1984) ; Presley v. Georgia , 558 U.S. 209 , 130 S.Ct. 721 , 175 L.Ed. 2d 675 (2010). 2018See, e.g., Waller v. Georgia , 467 U.S. 39 , 104 S.Ct. 2210 , 81 L.Ed. 2d 31 (1984) ; Presley v. Georgia , 558 U.S. 209 , 130 S.Ct. 721 , 175 L.Ed. 2d 675 (2010). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Njongegreen2 sentences2018See State v. Njonge, 181 Wn.2d 546 ,554 n.3, 334 P.3d 1068 (2014). 2018See State v. Njonge, 181 Wn.2d 546 ,554 n.3, 334 P.3d 1068 (2014). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Robertsgreen1 sentence2014See Roberts, 142 Wn.2d at 515 -16; Harling v. United States, 387 A.2d 1101 , 1105 -06 ( D. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Presley v. Georgia
green
2 sentences2018See, e.g., Waller v. Georgia , 467 U.S. 39 , 104 S.Ct. 2210 , 81 L.Ed. 2d 31 (1984) ; Presley v. Georgia , 558 U.S. 209 , 130 S.Ct. 721 , 175 L.Ed. 2d 675 (2010). 2018See, e.g., Waller v. Georgia , 467 U.S. 39 , 104 S.Ct. 2210 , 81 L.Ed. 2d 31 (1984) ; Presley v. Georgia , 558 U.S. 209 , 130 S.Ct. 721 , 175 L.Ed. 2d 675 (2010). | 2 | 2015–2018 |
United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez
green
2 sentences2014Consistent with our precedent, the United States Supreme Court recognized in United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez that where a person suffers a structural constitutional error, “[n]o additional showing of prejudice is required to make the violation ‘complete.’ ” 548 U.S. 140, 146 , 126 S. Ct. 2557 , 165 L. 2014Consistent with our precedent, the United States Supreme Court recognized in United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez that where a person suffers a structural constitutional error, “[n]o additional showing of prejudice is required to make the violation ‘complete.’ ” 548 U.S. 140, 146 , 126 S. Ct. 2557 , 165 L. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Sledge
green
1 sentence2019App. 77, 83 , 143 P.3d 343 (2006). 10 Id. at 88. 11State v. MacDonald, 183 Wn.2d 1, 8 , 346 P.3d 748 (2015)(quoting State v. Sledge, 133 Wn.2d 828, 839 , 947 P.2d 1199 (1997)). 3 No. 77059-4-1/4 or undermines a promised recommendation.12 Because any breach results in a structural constitutional error, whether the breach affects the court's sentencing decision is irrelevant to whether the breach occurred.13 Mobley argues the State breached the plea agreement by recommending a higher sentence than offered in the plea agreement. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. MacDonald
green
2 sentences2019App. 77, 83 , 143 P.3d 343 (2006). 10 Id. at 88. 11State v. MacDonald, 183 Wn.2d 1, 8 , 346 P.3d 748 (2015)(quoting State v. Sledge, 133 Wn.2d 828, 839 , 947 P.2d 1199 (1997)). 3 No. 77059-4-1/4 or undermines a promised recommendation.12 Because any breach results in a structural constitutional error, whether the breach affects the court's sentencing decision is irrelevant to whether the breach occurred.13 Mobley argues the State breached the plea agreement by recommending a higher sentence than offered in the plea agreement. 2019App. 77, 83 , 143 P.3d 343 (2006). 10 Id. at 88. 11State v. MacDonald, 183 Wn.2d 1, 8 , 346 P.3d 748 (2015)(quoting State v. Sledge, 133 Wn.2d 828, 839 , 947 P.2d 1199 (1997)). 3 No. 77059-4-1/4 or undermines a promised recommendation.12 Because any breach results in a structural constitutional error, whether the breach affects the court's sentencing decision is irrelevant to whether the breach occurred.13 Mobley argues the State breached the plea agreement by recommending a higher sentence than offered in the plea agreement. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Sledge
green
1 sentence2019App. 77, 83 , 143 P.3d 343 (2006). 10 Id. at 88. 11State v. MacDonald, 183 Wn.2d 1, 8 , 346 P.3d 748 (2015)(quoting State v. Sledge, 133 Wn.2d 828, 839 , 947 P.2d 1199 (1997)). 3 No. 77059-4-1/4 or undermines a promised recommendation.12 Because any breach results in a structural constitutional error, whether the breach affects the court's sentencing decision is irrelevant to whether the breach occurred.13 Mobley argues the State breached the plea agreement by recommending a higher sentence than offered in the plea agreement. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Carreno-Maldonado
green
1 sentence2019App. 77, 83 , 143 P.3d 343 (2006). 10 Id. at 88. 11State v. MacDonald, 183 Wn.2d 1, 8 , 346 P.3d 748 (2015)(quoting State v. Sledge, 133 Wn.2d 828, 839 , 947 P.2d 1199 (1997)). 3 No. 77059-4-1/4 or undermines a promised recommendation.12 Because any breach results in a structural constitutional error, whether the breach affects the court's sentencing decision is irrelevant to whether the breach occurred.13 Mobley argues the State breached the plea agreement by recommending a higher sentence than offered in the plea agreement. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Arizona v. Fulminante
green
1 sentence2014Ed. 2d 409 (2006), that where a person suffers a structural constitutional error, "[n]o additional showing of prejudice is required to make the violation 'complete.'" (Addressing violation of Sixth Amendment right to chosen counsel.) A structural error is unlike a trial error that concerns the "presentation of the case to the jury" and can be "quantitatively assessed in the context of other evidence presented in order to determine whether its admission was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt." Fulminante, 499 U.S. at 307 - 08. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Harling v. United States
green
1 sentence2014See Roberts, 142 Wn.2d at 515 -16; Harling v. United States, 387 A.2d 1101 , 1105 -06 ( D. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.