technical requirements test (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

technical requirements test in Washington

7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Department of Labor & Industries v. Lyons Enterprises, Inc.green
wash · 2016 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016When considering whether a contract's essence is personal labor, "[w]e focus on the realities of the situation rather than the technical requirements of the test."!25) "A core purpose of the IIA is to allocate the cost of workplace injuries" to the industry that generates them, so employers make workplaces safer.26 Accordingly, the IIA is "'liberally construed'... to further the purpose of providing compensation to all persons injured in their employment, with all doubts resolved in favor of the worker."27 "The [IIA] requires employers to report and pay workers' compensation premiums for all c

11
Kessinger v. Andersongreen
wash · 1948 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1974–1974
2 sentences

1974See Kessinger v. Anderson, 31 Wn.2d 157 , 196 P.2d 289 (1949); Bowman v. Webster, 44 Wn.2d 667 , 269 P.2d 960 (1954).

1974See Kessinger v. Anderson, 31 Wn.2d 157 , 196 P.2d 289 (1949); Bowman v. Webster, 44 Wn.2d 667 , 269 P.2d 960 (1954).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Dana's Housekeeping, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industries green
washctapp · 1995
2 sentences

2016App. 367,377 , 344 P.3d 13 Dep 't of Labor & Indus. v. Lyons Enters., Inc., No. 91610-1 I 741 (2015) (citing Dana's Housekeeping, Inc. v. Dep 't of Labor & Indus., 76 Wn.

2016App. 367, 377 , 344 P.3d 741 (2015) (citing Dana’s Housekeeping, Inc. v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 76 Wn.

42015–2016
B&R Sales, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industries green
washctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2016When considering whether a contract's essence is personal labor, "[w]e focus on the realities of the situation rather than the technical requirements of the test." B&R Sales, Inc. v. Dep't ofLabor & Indus., 186 Wn.

2016When considering whether a contract’s essence is personal labor, “[w]e focus on the realities of the situation rather than the technical requirements of the test.” B&R Sales, Inc. v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 186 Wn.

32016–2016
Lloyd's of Yakima Floor Center v. Department of Labor & Industries green
washctapp · 1983
2 sentences

2016When considering whether a contract's essence is personal labor, "[w]e focus on the realities of the situation rather than the technical requirements of the test."!25) "A core purpose of the IIA is to allocate the cost of workplace injuries" to the industry that generates them, so employers make workplaces safer.26 Accordingly, the IIA is "'liberally construed'... to further the purpose of providing compensation to all persons injured in their employment, with all doubts resolved in favor of the worker."27 "The [IIA] requires employers to report and pay workers' compensation premiums for all c

2016App. 745, 749 , 662 P.2d 391 (1982); then quoting ]d at 751; and then quoting B & R Sales, Inc., 186 Wn.

12016–2016
Department of Labor & Industries v. Tacoma Yellow Cab Co. neutral
washctapp · 1982
1 sentence

1993Department of Labor & Indus, v. Tacoma Yellow Cab Co., 31 Wn.

11993–1993
Bowman v. Webster green
wash · 1954
2 sentences

1974See Kessinger v. Anderson, 31 Wn.2d 157 , 196 P.2d 289 (1949); Bowman v. Webster, 44 Wn.2d 667 , 269 P.2d 960 (1954).

1974See Kessinger v. Anderson, 31 Wn.2d 157 , 196 P.2d 289 (1949); Bowman v. Webster, 44 Wn.2d 667 , 269 P.2d 960 (1954).

11974–1974

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.08.180 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.12.010 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.48.131 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.08.195 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 9 (1961–2014) WA 7 (1974–2016) CA 4 (1939–2016) FL 4 (1983–2011) TX 4 (1997–2006) UT 4 (2004–2007) PA 4 (2014–2023) MS 4 (1996–2000) ME 2 (1988–2009) HI 2 (1983–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check