Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Garzagreen2 sentences2002And regardless, “in order to dispute any of the information presented for consideration at a sentencing hearing, a defendant must make a timely and specific challenge.” State v. Garza, 123 Wn.2d 885, 890 , 872 P.2d 1087 (1994). 2002And regardless, “in order to dispute any of the information presented for consideration at a sentencing hearing, a defendant must make a timely and specific challenge.” State v. Garza, 123 Wn.2d 885, 890 , 872 P.2d 1087 (1994). | 1 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Butler
green
2 sentences2002State v. Butler, 75 Wn. 2002State v. Butler, 75 Wash.App. 47, 51 , 876 P.2d 481 (1994) (citing State v. Garza, 123 Wash.2d 885, 890 , 872 P.2d 1087 (1994)). | 2 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Atkinson
green
1 sentence2020“In order to dispute information in the [presentencing] report, the defendant must make a timely and specific challenge.” State v. Atkinson, 113 Wn. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Atkinson
green
1 sentence2020App. 661, 669 , 54 P.3d 702 (2002). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.