Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Yousoufian v. Office of King County Executivegreen2 sentences2011Id. at 437; see former RCW 42.17.340(4). ¶26 On remand, the trial court may — in the exercise of its discretion — decide to reopen the evidence for consideration of additional facts related to the Yousoufian factors and the penalties proportionate to Mesa’s misconduct. 2011Id. at 437; see former RCW 42.17.340(4). ¶26 On remand, the trial court may — in the exercise of its discretion — decide to reopen the evidence for consideration of additional facts related to the Yousoufian factors and the penalties proportionate to Mesa’s misconduct. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Yousoufian v. Office of Sims
green
2 sentences2018The Supreme Court’s holding that the Yousoufian factors “may not apply equally or at all in every case,” 168 Wn.2d at 468 , authorizes a trial court in an appropriate case to attribute more weight to the ninth aggravating factor, which does take deterrence and the size of the agency into consideration, than to other factors that do not. 2018The Supreme Court’s holding that the Yousoufian factors “may not apply equally or at all in every case,” 168 Wn.2d at 468 , authorizes a trial court in an appropriate case to attribute more weight to the ninth aggravating factor, which does take deterrence and the size of the agency into consideration, than to other factors that do not. | 7 | 2011–2018 |
Yousoufian v. Office of Ron Sims
green
1 sentence2011Yousoufian V altered the economic loss factor as follows: "any actual personal economic loss to the requestor resulting from the agency's misconduct, where the loss was foreseeable to the agency." 168 Wash.2d at 468 , 229 P.3d 735 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Yousoufian v. Office of Sims
neutral
1 sentence2011L & I also asserts that the trial court did not consider the final two Yousoufian factors, set forth in Yousoufian IV as "personal economic loss" and "a penalty amount necessary to deter future misconduct considering the size of the agency and the facts of the case." 165 Wash.2d at 459 , 200 P.3d 232 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.