7 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Griffin v. Wisconsingreen2 sentences2021See State v. Griffin, 131 Wis. 2d 41, 61 , 388 N.W.2d 535 (1986), aff’d, 483 U.S. 868 (1987); WIS. 2008Id. at 873-76. ¶ 11. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Griffingreen2 sentences1997Angelia D.B. cites Griffin, 131 Wis. 2d 41, 56 , as an example of our refusal to lower the probable cause standard for police searches, even though we permitted searches by another type of state official under a reasonable grounds standard. 1997Angelia D.B. cites Griffin, 131 Wis. 2d 41, 56 , as an example of our refusal to lower the probable cause standard for police searches, even though we permitted searches by another type of state official under a reasonable grounds standard. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Dilworthgreen2 sentences1997Ct. 1992) (applying the reasonable grounds standard to a search conducted by a plainclothes police officer for the school district); People v. Dilworth, 661 N.E.2d 310, 317 (Ill.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 1692 (1996) (applying the reasonable grounds standard to a search conducted by a police liaison officer "conducting a search on his own initiative and authority"). 1997Ct. 1992) (applying the reasonable grounds standard to a search conducted by a plainclothes police officer for the school district); People v. Dilworth, 661 N.E.2d 310, 317 (Ill.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 1692 (1996) (applying the reasonable grounds standard to a search conducted by a police liaison officer "conducting a search on his own initiative and authority"). | 1 | 1 |
JAR v. Stategreen2 sentences1997See Cason v. Cook, 810 F.2d 188 , 191—92 (8th Cir. 1987) (applying the reasonable grounds standard where a school official acted in conjunction with a liaison officer in response to a report of stolen items); People v. Alexander B., 270 Cal. Rptr. 342, 343-44 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990) (applying the reasonable grounds standard where a school official initiated an investigation and requested police to detain a group of students and search for a weapon); J.A.R. v. State, 689 So. 2d 1242, 1243 (Fla. Dist. 1997See Cason v. Cook, 810 F.2d 188, 191-92 (8th Cir. 1987) (applying the reasonable grounds standard where a school official acted in conjunction with a liaison officer in response to a report of stolen items); People v. Alexander B., 270 Cal. Rptr. 342, 343-44 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990) (applying the reasonable grounds standard where a school official initiated an investigation and requested police to detain a group of students and search for a weapon); J.A.R. v. State, 689 So. 2d 1242, 1243 (Fla. Dist. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Alexander B.green2 sentences1997See Cason v. Cook, 810 F.2d 188 , 191—92 (8th Cir. 1987) (applying the reasonable grounds standard where a school official acted in conjunction with a liaison officer in response to a report of stolen items); People v. Alexander B., 270 Cal. Rptr. 342, 343-44 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990) (applying the reasonable grounds standard where a school official initiated an investigation and requested police to detain a group of students and search for a weapon); J.A.R. v. State, 689 So. 2d 1242, 1243 (Fla. Dist. 1997See Cason v. Cook, 810 F.2d 188, 191-92 (8th Cir. 1987) (applying the reasonable grounds standard where a school official acted in conjunction with a liaison officer in response to a report of stolen items); People v. Alexander B., 270 Cal. Rptr. 342, 343-44 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990) (applying the reasonable grounds standard where a school official initiated an investigation and requested police to detain a group of students and search for a weapon); J.A.R. v. State, 689 So. 2d 1242, 1243 (Fla. Dist. | 1 | 1 |
In Interest of SFgreen2 sentences1997See In re S.F., 607 A.2d 793, 794 (Pa. Super. 1997See In re S.F., 607 A.2d 793, 794 (Pa. Super. | 1 | 1 |
Cason v. Cookgreen2 sentences1997See Cason v. Cook, 810 F.2d 188 , 191—92 (8th Cir. 1987) (applying the reasonable grounds standard where a school official acted in conjunction with a liaison officer in response to a report of stolen items); People v. Alexander B., 270 Cal. Rptr. 342, 343-44 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990) (applying the reasonable grounds standard where a school official initiated an investigation and requested police to detain a group of students and search for a weapon); J.A.R. v. State, 689 So. 2d 1242, 1243 (Fla. Dist. 1997See Cason v. Cook, 810 F.2d 188, 191-92 (8th Cir. 1987) (applying the reasonable grounds standard where a school official acted in conjunction with a liaison officer in response to a report of stolen items); People v. Alexander B., 270 Cal. Rptr. 342, 343-44 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990) (applying the reasonable grounds standard where a school official initiated an investigation and requested police to detain a group of students and search for a weapon); J.A.R. v. State, 689 So. 2d 1242, 1243 (Fla. Dist. | 1 | 1 |
New Jersey v. T. L. O.green2 sentences1997Court adopted the less stringent reasonable grounds standard in part because of the need of teachers to "maintain swift and informal disciplinary procedures," 469 U.S. at 340, 341 , it could be hazardous to discourage school officials from requesting the assistance of available trained police resources. 1997Court adopted the less stringent reasonable grounds standard in part because of the need of teachers to "maintain swift and informal disciplinary procedures," 469 U.S. at 340, 341 , it could be hazardous to discourage school officials from requesting the assistance of available trained police resources. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wilksgreen2 sentences1989See also Wilks, 117 Wis. 2d at 507 . 1989See also Wilks, 117 Wis. 2d at 507 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Baudhuingreen1 sentence1989See Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d at 650, 416 , N.W.2d at 63. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
AJM v. Stategreen2 sentences1997But see A.J.M. v. State, 617 So. 2d 1137, 1138 (Fla. Dist. 1997But see A.J.M. v. State, 617 So. 2d 1137, 1138 (Fla. Dist. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Angelia D.B.
green
2 sentences2021Id. ¶26 The T.L.O. standard was properly applied here because the search of Vang’s vehicle was deemed necessary by the school principal, rather than by police 11 No. 2018AP1730-CR officers. 2009Angelia D.B., 211 Wis. 2d at 147 . | 2 | 2009–2021 |
Polur v. Grievance Committee for the Southern District of New York
green
2 sentences1997Ct. 1992) (applying the reasonable grounds standard to a search conducted by a plainclothes police officer for the school district); People v. Dilworth, 661 N.E.2d 310, 317 (Ill.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 1692 (1996) (applying the reasonable grounds standard to a search conducted by a police liaison officer "conducting a search on his own initiative and authority"). 1997Ct. 1992) (applying the reasonable grounds standard to a search conducted by a plainclothes police officer for the school district); People v. Dilworth, 661 N.E.2d 310, 317 (Ill.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 1692 (1996) (applying the reasonable grounds standard to a search conducted by a police liaison officer "conducting a search on his own initiative and authority"). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.