Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1900–1970 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dunn's Ex'rs v. Renick
green
2 sentences1903Dunn v. Renick, 40 W.Va. 349 . 1902Va. 556 , Dunn v. Renick, 40 W. | 2 | 1902–1903 |
Vencill v. Vencill
green
1 sentence1970Va. 708 , *771 138 S. E. 731 , this Court held in point 2 of the syllabus that a final decree upon the merits after answer filed can not be reheard, reviewed or otherwise disturbed in the court below, after the end of the term at which it was pronounced, except for such matter as constitutes ground for a bill of review for error apparent in the decree, bill of review for newly discovered evidence, or an original bill to impeach it for sufficient cause, such as fraud in its procurement. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Thompson v. Parsley
neutral
2 sentences1955Thompson v. Parsley, 100 W. 1955Thompson v. Parsley, 100 W. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Snyder v. Middle States Loan, Building & Construction Co.
neutral
1 sentence1927Va. 655 , 44 S. E. 250 , holding that a final decree upon the merits after answer filed can not be reheard, reviewed or otherwise disturbed in the court below, after the end of the term at which it ivas pronounced, except for such matter as constitutes ground for a bill of review for error apparent in the decree, bill of review for newly discovered evidence, or an original bill to impeach it for sufficient cause, such as fraud in its procurement. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Maxwell v. Martin
neutral
1 sentence1906Maxwell v. Martin, 35 W. | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Lorentz v. Lorentz
neutral
1 sentence1902While it is not permissible, on a bill of review for error apparent in the decree, to look into the evidence and pass upon controverted matters of fact, Lorentz v. Lorentz, 32 W. | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Gray v. Baltimore Building & Loan Ass'n
neutral
1 sentence1902That the contract between the Building Association and Snyder is illegal, under the ruling of this Court in Gray v. Building Association, 48 W. | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Wethered v. Elliott
neutral
1 sentence1900Wethered v. Elliott, 45 W. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.