Free, and it takes a minute. A syfert.com account skips the bot checks on search and case pages, keeps your details and plan under the account icon, and comes with an MCP token for Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP-capable assistant, emailed to you with a link to the setup page and always available from the account icon.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2022 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Amy M. v. Kaufmangreen1 sentence2021Va. 251, 260 , 470 S.E.2d 205, 214 (1996). 14 Based on all of the foregoing, we find that the circuit court committed clear error (a) when it allowed A.G. to participate in an improvement period without filing a written motion for an improvement period and (b) when it allowed A.G.’s improvement period to continue for a period of time that far exceeded statutory limits and without making necessary statutory findings. | 1 | 1 |
State ex rel. Farmer v. Trentgreen2 sentences2015We have previously found that “[t]he burden of proving that a plea was involuntarily made rests upon the pleader.” State ex rel Farmer v. Trent, 209 W.Va. 789, 794 , 551 S.E.2d 711, 716 (2001) (quoting Syl. 2015We have previously found that “[t]he burden of proving that a plea was involuntarily made rests upon the pleader.” State ex rel Farmer v. Trent, 209 W.Va. 789, 794 , 551 S.E.2d 711, 716 (2001) (quoting Syl. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lewisgreen2 sentences2015See Lewis, 188 W.Va. at 89 , 422 S.E.2d at 811 (“[T]he State’s right to an appeal in a criminal case is contained in W.Va.Code, 58-5-30, and is confined to those cases where an indictment is held bad or insufficient by. the judgment or order of the circuit court[.]” (internal quotation marks omitted)). - The third Hoover factor, which involves the determination of whether the circuit court committed clear error as a matter of law, weighs in favor of granting the writ in the present case. 2015See Lewis, 188 W.Va. at 89 , 422 S.E.2d at 811 (“[T]he State’s right to an appeal in a criminal case is contained in W.Va.Code, 58-5-30, and is confined to those cases where an indictment is held bad or insufficient by. the judgment or order of the circuit court[.]” (internal quotation marks omitted)). - The third Hoover factor, which involves the determination of whether the circuit court committed clear error as a matter of law, weighs in favor of granting the writ in the present case. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
green
2 sentences2022West Virginia Code § 55-7-13d(a)(2) provides that “[f]ault of a nonparty shall be considered if the plaintiff entered into a settlement agreement with the nonparty . . . .” To the extent that Syllabus Point 2 of Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 210 W. 2022West Virginia Code § 55-7-13d(a)(2) provides that “[f]ault of a nonparty shall be considered if the plaintiff entered into a settlement agreement with the nonparty . . . .” To the extent that Syllabus Point 2 of Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 210 W. | 2 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Sears
green
2 sentences2015The Legislature has “substantive power to define crimes and prescribe punishments.” Syl. pt. 3, in part', State v. Sears, 196 W.Va. 71 , 468 S.E.2d 324 (1996). 2015The Legislature has “substantive power to define crimes and prescribe punishments.” Syl. pt. 3, in part', State v. Sears, 196 W.Va. 71 , 468 S.E.2d 324 (1996). | 2 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Huffman
green
2 sentences2015Petitioner contends that, by allowing the entire police report to be considered by the jury, petitioner was prejudiced.3 Petitioner further contends that the court committed clear error in 3 The police report contained several witness statements (at least one from a witness who did not testify at trial) and a reference to petitioner’s prior convictions for domestic violence. 2 admitting the entire police report, as the report included hearsay statements.4 With respect to the admission of evidence, this Court has held that “‘[t]he action of a trial court in admitting or excluding evidence in th 2015Petitioner contends that, by allowing the entire police report to be considered by the jury, petitioner was prejudiced.3 Petitioner further contends that the court committed clear error in 3 The police report contained several witness statements (at least one from a witness who did not testify at trial) and a reference to petitioner’s prior convictions for domestic violence. 2 admitting the entire police report, as the report included hearsay statements.4 With respect to the admission of evidence, this Court has held that “‘[t]he action of a trial court in admitting or excluding evidence in th | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.