Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Buttsgreen2 sentences2013State-agent Immunity I remain of the view that, in recent years, this Court has “ballooned” the “beyond authority” exception to State-agent immunity identified in Ex parte Cranman, 792 So.2d 392 (Ala.2000), and Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173, 178 (Ala.2000), into something that threatens to, and that taken to its logical conclusion does, swallow the rule of State-agent immunity also identified in those cases. 2013As I stated recently in L.N. v. Monroe County Board of Education, 141 So.3d 466, 473 (Ala.2013) (Murdock, J., concurring specially): “I remain of the view that, in recent years, this Court has ‘ballooned’ the ‘beyond authority’ exception to State-agent immunity identified in Ex part Cranman, 792 So.2d 392 (Ala.2000), and Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173, 178 (Ala.2000), into something that threatens to, and that taken to its logical conclusion does, swallow the rule of State-agent immunity also identified in those cases. | 2 | 2 |
Ex Parte Watsongreen2 sentences2013By this reference, I incorporate herein the position I expressed as to this issue in Ex parte Watson, 37 So.3d 752, 765-66 (Ala.2009) (Murdock, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). 2013By this reference, I incorporate herein the position I expressed as to this issue in Ex parte Watson, 37 So.3d 752, 765-66 (Ala.2009) (Murdock, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). | 2 | 2 |
L.N. v. Monroe County Board of Educationgreen1 sentence2013As I stated recently in L.N. v. Monroe County Board of Education, 141 So.3d 466, 473 (Ala.2013) (Murdock, J., concurring specially): “I remain of the view that, in recent years, this Court has ‘ballooned’ the ‘beyond authority’ exception to State-agent immunity identified in Ex part Cranman, 792 So.2d 392 (Ala.2000), and Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173, 178 (Ala.2000), into something that threatens to, and that taken to its logical conclusion does, swallow the rule of State-agent immunity also identified in those cases. | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Randallgreen1 sentence2007The main opinion criticizes this dissent for "appear[ing] to treat as exhaustive the list illustrating the basis of immunity in Cranman . " 971 So.2d at 664 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Cranman
green
2 sentences2013State-agent Immunity I remain of the view that, in recent years, this Court has “ballooned” the “beyond authority” exception to State-agent immunity identified in Ex parte Cranman, 792 So.2d 392 (Ala.2000), and Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173, 178 (Ala.2000), into something that threatens to, and that taken to its logical conclusion does, swallow the rule of State-agent immunity also identified in those cases. 2013As I stated recently in L.N. v. Monroe County Board of Education, 141 So.3d 466, 473 (Ala.2013) (Murdock, J., concurring specially): “I remain of the view that, in recent years, this Court has ‘ballooned’ the ‘beyond authority’ exception to State-agent immunity identified in Ex part Cranman, 792 So.2d 392 (Ala.2000), and Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173, 178 (Ala.2000), into something that threatens to, and that taken to its logical conclusion does, swallow the rule of State-agent immunity also identified in those cases. | 3 | 2006–2013 |
Ex Parte Wood
green
2 sentences2018The Court concluded that "Wood's affidavit simply recite[d] the rule of State-agent immunity restated in Cranman ." 852 So.2d at 710 . 2018The Court noted that, "[a]lthough Wood's affidavit state[d] the issues in terms that would lead to the conclusion that he [fell] under the immunity from liability set forth in Cranman , Wood fail[ed] to provide any significant facts relating to his personal involvement in the actions giving rise to the claims asserted against him." Id. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Ex Parte Rizk
green
1 sentence2000Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |