Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1984–1989 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Beck v. Stategreen2 sentences1989VIII In reviewing the appellant's death sentence, which arose under Alabama's 1975 capital murder statute, we make the following findings pursuant to the three-tiered analysis of Beck v. State , 396 So.2d 645 (Ala. 1980): the appellant was convicted of murder wherein two or more persons are murdered by one or a series of acts, § 13-11-2(a)(10), Code of Alabama (1975) (repealed); murder committed during the course of a robbery in the first degree, § 13-11-2(a)(2), Code of Alabama (1975) (repealed); and murder done for pecuniary or other valuable consideration or pursuant to a contract for hire, 1986In reviewing appellant's death sentence by the three-tiered analysis of Beck v. State , 396 So.2d 645 (Ala. 1980), we make the following findings: First, appellant was convicted of murder during a kidnapping in the first degree, in violation of § 13A-5-40 (a)(1), Code of Alabama 1975. | 1 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bumper v. North Carolina
green
2 sentences1989Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 548 , 88 S.Ct. 1788, 1792 , 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968). ‘Consent must be proved by clear and positive testimony “ ‘In determining the specifics necessary to sustain the burden of showing that consent was voluntary, this court has established a three-tiered analysis. 1989Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 548 , 88 S.Ct. 1788, 1792 , 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968). ‘Consent must be proved by clear and positive testimony “ ‘In determining the specifics necessary to sustain the burden of showing that consent was voluntary, this court has established a three-tiered analysis. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.