three-tiered analysis in Alabama

6 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1984–1989 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Beck v. Stategreen ala · 1981 · cited in 5 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1984–1989 2 sentences 1989VIII In reviewing the appellant's death sentence, which arose under Alabama's 1975 capital murder statute, we make the following findings pursuant to the three-tiered analysis of Beck v. State , 396 So.2d 645 (Ala. 1980): the appellant was convicted of murder wherein two or more persons are murdered by one or a series of acts, § 13-11-2(a)(10), Code of Alabama (1975) (repealed); murder committed during the course of a robbery in the first degree, § 13-11-2(a)(2), Code of Alabama (1975) (repealed); and murder done for pecuniary or other valuable consideration or pursuant to a contract for hire, 1986In reviewing appellant's death sentence by the three-tiered analysis of Beck v. State , 396 So.2d 645 (Ala. 1980), we make the following findings: First, appellant was convicted of murder during a kidnapping in the first degree, in violation of § 13A-5-40 (a)(1), Code of Alabama 1975.	1	5

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

Case	Cited	Years
Bumper v. North Carolina green scotus · 1968 2 sentences 1989Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 548 , 88 S.Ct. 1788, 1792 , 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968). ‘Consent must be proved by clear and positive testimony “ ‘In determining the specifics necessary to sustain the burden of showing that consent was voluntary, this court has established a three-tiered analysis. 1989Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 548 , 88 S.Ct. 1788, 1792 , 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968). ‘Consent must be proved by clear and positive testimony “ ‘In determining the specifics necessary to sustain the burden of showing that consent was voluntary, this court has established a three-tiered analysis.	1	1989–1989

Where else courts name it

OH 260 (1999–2026) ID 30 (1991–2014) NM 21 (1986–2025) LA 12 (1984–2013) NY 7 (1990–2006) AL 6 (1984–1989) IL 4 (1987–2023) UT 4 (1993–2011) PA 4 (1981–2011) CO 4 (1986–1992) OK 3 (1997–2005) IN 3 (1998–2005) NJ 3 (1986–2002) NC 3 (1984–2015) MT 3 (1986–1988) MN 2 (1988–2017) HI 2 (1992–1994) DC 2 (1980–2025) MA 2 (2007–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check