Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 1894–1974 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
White v. United States
green
2 sentences1974White v. United States, 305 U.S. 281 , 59 S. Ct. 179 , 83 L. 1974White v. United States, 305 U.S. 281 , 59 S. Ct. 179 , 83 L. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
United States v. REESE
green
1 sentence1928In discussing the application of the same rule in United States v. Reese, 92 U. S. 214 , 23 L. ed. 563, it was said: “We are not able to reject a part which is unconstitutional and retain the remainder, because it is not possible to separate that which is unconstitutional, if theie be any such, from that which is not.. | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Arkansas National Bank v. Johnson
neutral
1 sentence1923In the application of the same principle in Arkansas National Bank v. Johnson, 122 Ark. 1 , and cases cited, this court held that, where the possession of drafts and money is obtained from the owner through a trick or device, with the intent, at the time the party receives them, to convert the same to his own use, and the owner of the property parts merely with the possession and not with the title, the party receiving the property is guilty of larceny. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Harrison v. Abington
neutral
1 sentence1920This is also in accord with the decision of this court in the recent case of Harrison v. Abington, 140 Ark. 115 , which construed a special statute, but involved the application of the same principle in the interpretation of two apparently conflicting sections of a statute. | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Emert v. Missouri
green
1 sentence1910It is insisted that this particular question was not raised nor decided in the Supreme Court of the United States in the cases cited above; but in the case of Emert v. Missouri, supra, though the particular question discussed is as to whether or not the statute violated the interstate commerce clause of the Constitution, the opinion contains, we think, a distinct recognition of the validity of the Missouri statute imposing a tax on the privilege of peddling certain articles and exempting others. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Hanks v. Harris
neutral
1 sentence1894Hanks v. Harris, 29 Ark. 323 ; Healy v. Conner, 40 Ark. 352 . | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Healy v. Conner
green
1 sentence1894Hanks v. Harris, 29 Ark. 323 ; Healy v. Conner, 40 Ark. 352 . | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.